Re: help with Wikipedia task

2019-04-18 Thread Rich Bowen
Bob Marley? Really? I'm increasingly coming to believe that everything coming through on the "help wanted" thing is spam, and it may be time to shut it down. Discouraging, given our high hopes going in. On 4/16/19 3:49 PM, Bob Marley wrote: Hi, I could help with the task:

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

2019-04-18 Thread Eric Covener
>Knowing what companies are investing in a given area, allows users & >contributors know who to contact to move their own contributions faster and >gives companies the ability to accept user suggestions. I am not a purist by any stretch, but I don't see this benefiting even the

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

2019-04-18 Thread Sam Ruby
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:54 PM Joan Touzet wrote: > > On 2019-04-17 9:04 p.m., Griselda Cuevas wrote: [snip] > > > Thank you! > > And thank you for raising something that I've been too nervous to bring > up on my own. Yes, thank you Gris for bringing this up. And also thank you Joan for being

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

2019-04-18 Thread Mark Thomas
This is a tricky one. If everything is working as it should, corporate affiliation is irrelevant. However, employment is a factor in a number of different ways a project can start to head in the wrong direction. For example, employees of a company always giving priority to reviewing and

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

2019-04-18 Thread Alex Harui
From the peanut gallery: IMO, big corporations have enough money to get their names out there and influence projects if they want to. So, it might be the best use of time to find ways to limit the impact on the projects instead of trying to prevent them from using their names. The ASF tends

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

2019-04-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
Another item about the below is that I think it reflects, on many many levels, the current "understanding" or "interpretation" of open source that is being perpetuated by such entities as the Linux Foundation and believed by several companies as well. I see on almost a daily basis companies

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

2019-04-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yes. Corporate affiliation is really immaterial, and should be. Another reason for this is that one's job may, and often does, change. Who you are, and what you do, and how you provide "value" to a project, should not and does not. To associate one's merit with one's employment means that every

Re: [Discuss] Attributing contributions to commercial vendors investing in projects

2019-04-18 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 4/17/2019 11:27 AM, Griselda Cuevas wrote: It brings clarity to project roadmap and dependencies. Knowing what companies are investing in a given area, allows users & contributors know who to contact to move their own contributions faster and gives companies the ability to