On 2023-07-19 11:45, tison wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Automating this process *requires* a
reproducible build process that has been approved by the ASF security
team
It sseems the security team has limited bandwidth to process such a review
request. I make the request to secur...@apache.org for
Hi Daniel,
> Automating this process *requires* a
> reproducible build process that has been approved by the ASF security
> team
It sseems the security team has limited bandwidth to process such a review
request. I make the request to secur...@apache.org for OpenDAL (incubating)
and the team
On 2023-07-19 11:21, Francis Chuang wrote:
Is infra happy to explore the case where release artifacts are automatically
uploaded via CI?
The exploration is already ongoing.
This would go a long way towards automating our release process as asking RMs
to download the release artifacts from
Is infra happy to explore the case where release artifacts are automatically
uploaded via CI?
This would go a long way towards automating our release process as asking RMs
to download the release artifacts from GitHub and uploading them manually is a
bit clunky.
On 2023/07/18 19:55:00 Volkan
Abstract: Signing release artifacts using an automated release
infrastructure has been officially approved by LEGAL. This enables
projects to sign artifacts using, say, GitHub Actions.
I have been trying to overhaul the Log4j release process and make it
as frictionless as possible since last
