Stale documentation PR

Hi, I just noticed that this pull request (Document CB-6344-and-CB-6698: * after attribute for * element for Android) is still unmerged. I didn't find an

RE: Plugman support for Android libraries

Hi, I created a PR for this but didn't have time to add any new unit tests. Can you please write some? :) Martin Bektchiev AppBuilder Core Team -Original Message- From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 5:40

RE: Plugman support for Android libraries

intention). Looking forward to your thoughts on this! ~Martin Bektchiev -Original Message- From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 11:26 PM To: dev Subject: Re: Plugman support for Android libraries Just tested this

RE: [VOTE] Plugins Release

It seems that the tag points to a commit which is not present in any of the branches. I guess that the correct commit which should be tagged is: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-plugin-inappbrowser.git;a=commit;h=992306bbc58f3ba9dc0f4dbcde1b084db5ba8169 -Original Message

RE: Plugman support for Android libraries

le would be better I think. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Martin Bektchiev < martin.bektch...@telerik.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I want to ask you for ideas about how would it be best to solve an issue > that I'm facing. Sometimes a plugin's implementation depends o

Plugman support for Android libraries

be implemented? Is it a good idea to use the framework tag? Should the implementation depend on calling "android update project" or would it be better to directly edit the project.properties file? Any ideas and suggestions will be more than welcome! Looking forward to your thoughts! Best regards, Martin Bektchiev

Plugman support for Android libraries

be implemented? Is it a good idea to use the framework tag? Should the implementation depend on calling "android update project" or would it be better to directly edit the project.properties file? Any ideas and suggestions will be more than welcome! Looking forward to your thoughts! Best regards, Martin Bektchiev

RE: CB-6028: Fix for infinte loop in plugman with plugins with cyclic dependencies

My first idea was to allow the installation of such interdependent plugins, but then I saw that once added they cannot be uninstalled due to the cylce in the graph. That's why I decided to stay consistent with uninstall and not allow it. Besides what is the point in having such interdependent p

CB-6028: Fix for infinte loop in plugman with plugins with cyclic dependencies

Hi guys, I have prepared a pull request for fixing the above-mentioned issue. Can you please review it at https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugman/pull/54? Thanks in advance! Martin

Plugman optimizations

: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5885 Thank you in advance! Best regards, Martin Bektchiev