Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user TimBarham commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104953745
Ok, updated with that functionality - if we don't find it installed, and we
don't find it in the mapper list, then we add `cordova-plugin-` to the start
(if it is
Github user muratsu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104789786
:+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104788948
Yeah, I like that better.
If we fail to find it in our typical id search, we then retry with the
addition of `cordova-plugin-`
Incidentally, internally
Github user TimBarham commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104787089
Hmmm... Interesting point. I like the convenience of a short name, but I
don't think it is worth the weirdness of adding a custom field to package.json
just for t
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104784245
So, I discussed this a bit with Steve, and he brought up an interesting
point.
A stretch goal is to not have a plugin.xml file at all, and simply use
pa
Github user TimBarham commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104762109
Hah, yeah, I think that'd definitely be doable. I won't include it as part
of this change, though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225#issuecomment-104747950
Interesting, I like it.
How about removing by path/url?
Does it make sense having installed via `cordova plugin add ../myplugin/`
that I could the
GitHub user TimBarham opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/225
CB-9065 Allow removing plugins by short name.
Adds logic to `plugin remove` to look up a plugin by "short name" if we
don't find it by id. This means, for example, that you can use the follow
