The vote has now closed. The results are:
Positive Binding Votes: 3
Niklas Merz
Norman Breau
Bryan Ellis
Negative Binding Votes: 0
The vote has passed.
On November 21, 2023, Erisu wrote:
> I vote +1
>
> * Confirmed sigs & hashes with `coho verify-archive` [1]
> * Verified sha1s match tags wit
I vote +1
* Confirmed sigs & hashes with `coho verify-archive` [1]
* Verified sha1s match tags with `coho verify-tags` [2]
* Re-created archives to ensure contents match release candidate [3]
* Verified existence for required Apache files : NOTICE & LICENSE
* Verified package.json & package-lock.j
I vote +1:
- Ran NPM test
- Ran NPM audit
- Verified archive
- Verified tags
- Ran paramedic on android API 33
On 2023-11-10 6:42 a.m., Niklas Merz wrote:
Please review and vote on the release of this plugins release
by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
The plu
Please review and vote on the release of this plugins release
by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
The plugins have been published to dist/dev:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/inappbrowser6/
The packages were published from their corresponding git t
ft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 2:38 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release
>
> I vote +1.
>
> * Verified signatures and hashes
> * Ran coho audit-license-headers over the repo
> * Ran plugin auto tests to ensure they are passing
...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 2:38 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release
I vote +1.
* Verified signatures and hashes
* Ran coho audit-license-headers over the repo
* Ran plugin auto tests to ensure they are passing
-
Best regards, Vladimir
7:45 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release
I vote +1.
* Verified signatures and hashes
* Verified tag
* Verified that plugin can be added correctly to blank app
* Verified that blank app can be successfully built and ran
* Ran smoke testing of mobilespec app
(Akvelon) [mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 3:18 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release
Please review and vote on the InAppBrowser plugin release by replying to this
email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
Release issue:
https
om: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:44 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] InAppBrowser Plugin Release
Hey Sean,
We only -1 if it is a regression or major bug found. I would say CB-7786
doesn't qualify as either of those.
A
Hey Sean,
We only -1 if it is a regression or major bug found. I would say CB-7786
doesn't qualify as either of those.
According to ASF policies, only PMC members can vote.
I know you have been trying to get someone to review your PR. I'll bug some
people tomorrow to see if we can get it reviewe
I'd vote no. I'd really like to see CB-7786 get in before the next release.
SeanK
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) <
v-seg...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Please review and vote on the InAppBrowser plugin release
> by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS
Please review and vote on the InAppBrowser plugin release
by replying to this email (and keep discussion on the DISCUSS thread)
Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-10505
The plugin has been published to dist/dev:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-10505/
The pa
12 matches
Mail list logo