nks for the quick replies, sorry mine was so long in coming,
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 09:00
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin ver
o meet the needs of a specific
plugin.
Thanks for the quick replies, sorry mine was so long in coming,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 09:00
To: dev
Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin version
Just add a quick comment as well.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Ray Camden wrote:
> oh - I didn’t see your comment Shaz. Thanks!
>
>
> On 10/1/14, 9:33 AM, "Ray Camden" wrote:
>
> >No one complained, so I assume it is perfect. ;) Seriously though - feel
> >free to comment on the blog if you
oh - I didn’t see your comment Shaz. Thanks!
On 10/1/14, 9:33 AM, "Ray Camden" wrote:
>No one complained, so I assume it is perfect. ;) Seriously though - feel
>free to comment on the blog if you have suggestions.
>
>On 9/30/14, 4:35 PM, "Ray Camden" wrote:
>
>>Any comments folks?
>>
>>https:/
No one complained, so I assume it is perfect. ;) Seriously though - feel
free to comment on the blog if you have suggestions.
On 9/30/14, 4:35 PM, "Ray Camden" wrote:
>Any comments folks?
>
>https://gist.github.com/cfjedimaster/b689cbf528cddaa2391a
>
>
>On 9/30/14, 11:57 AM, "Michal Mocny" wrot
Any comments folks?
https://gist.github.com/cfjedimaster/b689cbf528cddaa2391a
On 9/30/14, 11:57 AM, "Michal Mocny" wrote:
>I'm not an expert on requirements, but I'm happy to review your
>post.
>
>-Michal
>
>On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Ray Camden wrote:
>
>> Ah, good point there.
>>
>>
Thanks Ray! That would be great.
I concur with what Michal said. Unfortunately, testing with older releases
hasn't been our focus (resources and whatnot).
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Michal Mocny wrote:
> I'm not an expert on requirements, but I'm happy to review your
> post.
>
> -Michal
>
I'm not an expert on requirements, but I'm happy to review your
post.
-Michal
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Ray Camden wrote:
> Ah, good point there.
>
> I¹m going to write up a blog post on this after I run some errands. I¹d
> love a quick review from you, or anyone, before I publish. I¹m
Ah, good point there.
I¹m going to write up a blog post on this after I run some errands. I¹d
love a quick review from you, or anyone, before I publish. I¹m also going
to add something to the core docs.
On 9/30/14, 11:18 AM, "Michal Mocny" wrote:
>That sounds reasonable.
>
>The tag is a bit w
That sounds reasonable.
The tag is a bit weird though, in that the dependency is on cli
and not platform version. Combined with CLI semver and platform release
unbundling, its a bit hard to reason about. It kinda still works because
we have default platform versions pinned to cli versions, but
Ah - never mind. I picked a plugin that didn’t have it specified. I picked
another random one and it *was* shown.
I’d say that for plugins w/o engine support, the site should still say
something, even if
Engine Number
Not Specified
On 9/30/14, 11:09 AM, "Ray Camden" wrote:
>Query - why isn¹t
Query - why isn¹t data shown on plugins.cordova.io? That seems
like crucial data that should be displayed, right?
On 9/30/14, 10:59 AM, "Michal Mocny" wrote:
>
>In theory, we should know when plugins depend on a certain minimum
>platform
>version, and even have a plugin.xml tag to specify this (
Paul:
You are right. When we do a platform release, we test with the latest
plugins to make sure the platform isn't breaking things. When we do a
plugins release, we test with the latest platforms to make sure the plugins
are breaking things.
In theory, we should know when plugins depend on a c
gt;
>-Original Message-
>From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 07:05
>To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin versions
>
>Yes
>
>On Monday, September 29, 2014, Joshi, Pavankumar
>
>wrote:
>
>> Thanks
Just being annoying. ;) I can see this type of question though being
something users will bring up.
On 9/30/14, 9:46 AM, "Shazron" wrote:
>He didnt ask that question, but Ray: yes.
>
>On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Ray Camden wrote:
>
>> Does it make sense to clarify that statement though? Not
ova-plugin-statusbar: 0.1.7
> > cordova-plugin-vibration: 0.3.10
> >
> > are plugins latest version for examplecordova-plugin-battery-status:
> > 0.2.11 is tested with 3.6?
> >
> > Regards
> > Pavan Joshi
> >
> >
> > -Origin
? I am asking this because if I download and use Cordova 3.6.0
> >> release, then can I continuously upgrade the plugins to the latest
> >>released
> >> version?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks and Regards
> >> Pavan Joshi
> >>
> >>
> >>
shi
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com ]
>> Sent: Monday, 29 September 2014 4:59 PM
>> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin versions
>>
>> Plugins are independently released an
3.6.0
> release, then can I continuously upgrade the plugins to the latest released
> version?
>
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Pavan Joshi
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com ]
> Sent: Monday, 29 September 2014 4:59 PM
> To: dev
Pavan Joshi
-Original Message-
From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2014 4:59 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin versions
Plugins are independently released and not tied to a particular version.
That just shows it was tested with
Thank you very much for the information.
Regards
Pavan Joshi
-Original Message-
From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 29 September 2014 4:59 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin versions
Plugins are independently released and not tied to a
nal Message-
> From: Shazron [mailto:shaz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 29 September 2014 4:20 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin versions
>
> Always use the latest.
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Joshi, Pavankumar <
> jos...@fast
@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.6 cordova plugin versions
Always use the latest.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Joshi, Pavankumar <
jos...@fast.au.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> Kindly clarify our doubt. It’s a blocker issue for us.
>
> Regarding 3.6 release, which versions
Always use the latest.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Joshi, Pavankumar <
jos...@fast.au.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> Kindly clarify our doubt. It’s a blocker issue for us.
>
> Regarding 3.6 release, which versions of plugins should we use?
> In the News page of Apache Cordova 3.6 rele
24 matches
Mail list logo
