> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Hu, Ningxin
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> An update: the legal/license is cleared to host
> > > >> cordova-crosswalk-engine under https://github.com/crossw
t; > >
> > >> An update: the legal/license is cleared to host
> > >> cordova-crosswalk-engine under https://github.com/crosswalk-project/.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -ningxin
> > >>
> > >> > -Origin
red to host
> >> cordova-crosswalk-engine under https://github.com/crosswalk-project/.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -ningxin
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-
> >> > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com]
> >> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Clelland [mailto:iclell...@google.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:04 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> That's great news!
>
Really!
> Do you want to
> Thanks,
>> -ningxin
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 8:56 AM
>> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
t; > Ian
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Hu, Ningxin
> wrote:
> > > > >> - who publishes the plugins, intel or cordova?
> > > > >
> > > > > For this open, could someone elaborate it a littl
t;
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Hu, Ningxin wrote:
> > > >> - who publishes the plugins, intel or cordova?
> > > >
> > > > For this open, could someone elaborate it a little bit more? What
> > > > does
> > > it mean
gt; > >>> > the Crosswalk Cordova Engine in Crosswalk projects. The feedback
> > >>> > is very positive. I am now going through the required
> > >>> > legal/license clearance process. I will keep you posted about the
> > >&
t; > >>> > Crosswalk Cordova Engine in Crosswalk projects. The feedback is
> very
> > >>> > positive. I am now going through the required legal/license
> clearance
> > >>> > process. I will keep you posted about the status.
&
My understanding is that as a corporate contributor, you need both a CCLA from
your corporation and an ICLA as an individual in that corporation. See the
"Contributor License Agreement" section of http://www.apache.org/licenses/ .
On May 6, 2014, at 11:18 AM, "Hu, Ningxin" wrote:
> Intel has s
distribution
> >>> > > can then be in any form that makes sense (and complies with the
> >>> > > licenses
> >>> > of the
> >>> > > various components)
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Joe's right that i
> -ningxin
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf
> > > > Of
> > > Ian
> > > > Clelland
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:23 AM
>
> > positive. I am now going through the required legal/license clearance
>>> > process. I will keep you posted about the status.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > -ningxin
>>> >
>>> > > -Original Message-
>>> &g
d legal/license clearance
>> > process. I will keep you posted about the status.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -ningxin
>> >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf
>> > > Of
&g
> BTW: Have you signed the ICLA yet? If not we should get that taken care
>of
> ASAP
Hu, Ningxin wrote:
> Intel has signed the CCLA as corporate contributor. So I assume I think
>I don't need to sign ICLA, correct?
>
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
> Note that a Corporate CLA does not rem
ep you posted about the status.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -ningxin
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf
> > > Of
> > Ian
> > > Clelland
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2
t; > -Original Message-
> > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of
> Ian
> > Clelland
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:23 AM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> >
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of Ian
> Clelland
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:23 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:
4:47 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> Think those builds should be hosted by those downstreams anyhow. Cordova is
> sort of the low level, on the metal, default webview and building these
> things is
> a very delibe
el or cordova?
> > >
> > > For this open, could someone elaborate it a little bit more? What does
> > it mean? I remembered someone mentioned the license is open in the
> > hangouts, any details?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -ningxin
> > >
> &
at does
> it mean? I remembered someone mentioned the license is open in the
> hangouts, any details?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -ningxin
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> >
gt; mean? I remembered someone mentioned the license is open in the hangouts, any
> details?
>
> Thanks,
> -ningxin
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
>> Mocny
>> Sent: Saturday, April 2
ailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:53 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> Notes:
>
> - native junit tests needs fixing (due to deprication)
>
> - common script for crea
m: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:53 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> Notes:
>
> - native junit tests needs fixing (due to deprication)
>
> - com
> Michal wrote:
> One more TODO: We should make sure to support Crosswalk within an app using
> multiple CordovaWebView's, and make sure they share resources best they can.
>
This is the design goal of Crosswalk WebView. Crosswalk WebView is using single
process architecture, multiple Crosswalk
One more TODO: We should make sure to support Crosswalk within an app using
multiple CordovaWebView's, and make sure they share resources best they can.
-Michal
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> Hey
>
> Since we don't have confirmation on the Mozilla guys, let's not do the
>
Hey
Since we don't have confirmation on the Mozilla guys, let's not do the
4:00 PM meeting. This kinda sucks, but yeah, we should touch base
sometime next week when we've moved forward a bit.
Sorry for making people wait all day for this thing. I hope that you
can salvage your evening!
Joe
On
Notes:
- native junit tests needs fixing (due to deprication)
- common script for creating walk mobilespec
- fix failing mobile spec tests (file-transfer?, media?)
- who publishes the plugins, intel or cordova?
- static vs dynamic xwalk lib
- (option) one plugin, use hooks to download stati
Ian Clelland wrote:
>https://staging.talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/7ecpi3uaclcuedn7imn6b9jdq
>c
https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/7ecpi3uaclcuedn7imn6b9jdqc
Might work. Staging is probably internal.
Ian Clelland wrote:
>Sounds like 09:00AM PDT
>12:00PM EDT
>00:00 China Standard Time
>16:00 UTC
>
>2014-04-25T16:00:00Z
>
>:)
>
>(Based on Ningxin saying that he wasn't waiting around for the morning)
Which would be now, is there a way to join this meeting?
in
Cc: Joe Bowser; dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Hu, Ningxin
mailto:ningxin...@intel.com>> wrote:
> Mobilespec runs on my N4, with 10 failing tests: 3 in contacts; 7 in
> file-transfer. Otherwise, thi
gt; > >> new changes in the upstream project break the plugin :)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > +1. So the bot need to build and run mobilespec test suite. Do you
>> know
>> > > whether the bot can drive
t; >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > -ningxin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of
> > Ian
> > > Clelland
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24,
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -ningxin
> >
> >
> >
> > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of
> Ian
> > Clelland
> >
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:58 PM
> > To: Hu, Ningxin
> > Cc: Joe Bo
spec via adb?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -ningxin
>
>
>
> From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of Ian
> Clelland
>
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:58 PM
> To: Hu, Ningxin
> Cc: Joe Bowser; dev@cordova.apache.org
&
s...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 11:00 PM
> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> > >
> > > I might be able to make it but Mozilla can't from what I heard. I don't
> > kno
Thanks,
> -ningxin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 11:00 PM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> >
> > I might be abl
I will be on hangouts at that time.
Thanks,
-ningxin
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 11:00 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> I might b
f we agree with this time (9am Pacific, 12am
> > Eastern
> > > > and 0am China)? I will stay till mid-night, but maybe not to next
> > morning
> > > > :p.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -ningxin
> > > >
> > > > >
iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Ian
> > > > Clelland
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:58 PM
> > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
half Of
> > Ian
> > > Clelland
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:58 PM
> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Hu, Ningxin
> > wrote:
&
; Thanks,
> -ningxin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of
> Ian
> > Clelland
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:58 PM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring
nd
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:58 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Hu, Ningxin wrote:
>
> > Understood.
> >
> > How about 9am Pacific, 12am Eastern and 0am China
lk to you soon.
Thanks,
-ningxin
From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of Ian
Clelland
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 10:20 AM
To: Hu, Ningxin
Cc: Joe Bowser; dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
That's some close timing --
emented it in the PR update. Please review.
>
>
>
> -ningxin
>
>
>
> *From:* iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] *On Behalf Of *Ian
> Clelland
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:58 PM
> *To:* Hu, Ningxin
> *Cc:* Joe Bowser; dev@cordova.apache.org
>
hanks. I've implemented it in the PR update. Please review.
-ningxin
From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of Ian
Clelland
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:58 PM
To: Hu, Ningxin
Cc: Joe Bowser; dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for differen
tches to crosswalk break the
> cordova-crosswalk-engine.
>
>
>
> Your thoughts?
>
That would be good to have -- I'd like to have some kind of warning that
new changes in the upstream project break the plugin :)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -ningxin
>
>
>
> *From:*
nal Message-
> > From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> > Mocny
> > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:45 AM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> >
> > (Yeah 7pm Friday is more naughty than 4am
Forgot to mention, the test runs on my Nexus 5.
-ningxin
> -Original Message-
> From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 5:27 PM
> To: Ian Clelland; Joe Bowser
> Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for
o crosswalk break the cordova-crosswalk-engine.
Your thoughts?
Thanks,
-ningxin
From: iclell...@google.com [mailto:iclell...@google.com] On Behalf Of Ian
Clelland
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 1:32 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Cc: Joe Bowser; Hu, Ningxin
Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for
t;> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > -ningxin
>> > >
>> > > From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf
>> > Of
>> > > Brian LeRoux
>> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 6:10 AM
>&
t;
> > > > From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On
> > > > Behalf
> > > Of
> > > > Brian LeRoux
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 6:10 AM
> > > > To: Joe Bowser
> > > > Cc: d
ly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -ningxin
> > >
> > > From: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > Brian LeRoux
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 6:10 AM
> > > To: Joe Bowser
> >
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 6:10 AM
> > To: Joe Bowser
> > Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org; Hu, Ningxin
> > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> >
> > How does 1:00PST on Friday work for a hangout for everyone?
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 23
Hu, Ningxin wrote:
> I am in China. 1:00 PM PST means 4:00 AM here :o.
> Could you please schedule it a little bit later, say 4:00 or 5:00 PM
>PST? It will be highly appreciated.
In principle, as someone on the East Coast. I will not show up for a
meeting that might end past 5pm Eastern Time on a
: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Brian LeRoux
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 6:10 AM
> To: Joe Bowser
> Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org; Hu, Ningxin
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> How does 1:00PST on Friday work for a h
AM
To: Joe Bowser
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org; Hu, Ningxin
Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
How does 1:00PST on Friday work for a hangout for everyone?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Joe Bowser
mailto:bows...@gmail.com>> wrote:
BTW: Here's my PoC for Moz
That works for me
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014, Joe Bowser wrote:
> Sounds good
> On Apr 23, 2014 3:10 PM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote:
>
> > How does 1:00PST on Friday work for a hangout for everyone?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> >
> >> BTW: Here's my PoC for Mozi
view interest group:
>> >> > > >>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial
>> introduction
>> >> > > >>> > and
>> >> > > >>> > discussion of next steps?
>> >> > > >>> >
>&
gt; > > >>> For
> >> > > some
> >> > > >>> reason it's not rendering on the screen.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Ideally it'd be cool to have at least two options when this
> >> >
o options when this
>> > > >>> feature
>> > > finally
>> > > >>> lands.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> What do other people think?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Joe
>> > > >>>
>
> > > >>> Joe
> > > >>> On 22 Apr 2014 20:06, "Hu, Ningxin" wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Joe,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Thanks for your review and merge the PRs.
> > >
cool to have at least two options when this feature
>> > finally
>> > >>> lands.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> What do other people think?
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Joe
>> > >>> On 22 Apr 2014 20:06, "Hu, Ningxin" wrote:
&
;>> > Joe,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thanks for your review and merge the PRs.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > To pluggable webview interest group:
> > >>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial int
merge the PRs.
> >>> >
> >>> > To pluggable webview interest group:
> >>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial introduction and
> >>> > discussion of next steps?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
>
>>> > Thanks for your review and merge the PRs.
>>> >
>>> > To pluggable webview interest group:
>>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial introduction and
>>> > discussion of next steps?
>>> >
>>> > Th
ussion of next steps?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -ningxin
>> >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com]
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM
>> > > To: dev@cordova
> -ningxin
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM
> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different
a hangout this week for initial introduction and
> discussion of next steps?
>
> Thanks,
> -ningxin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin...@intel.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM
> > To: dev@cordova.apache.or
: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> The PoC is great! Quite excited about the direction!
>
> I've sent a PR to update the cordova-crosswalk-engine to latest crosswalk
> embedding API.
e-
> From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:45 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> Yeah, I'd be cool with setting up a hangout. Everyone should take a look at
> the
> PoC, I've basi
it works,
> please feel free to schedule one and count me in.
>
> Thanks,
> -ningxin
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
>> Mocny
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:39 PM
>> To: dev
ny
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:39 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> Would it be alright to set up a Hangout some time to introduce everyone?
>
> Joe has been leading the effort here, but there are other cordova contributors
> f
19, 2014 7:08 AM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> >
> > Hey
> >
> > After debugging, I did some minor updates to the plugin README. It
> should be
> > easier to get this up and running, although there's still
WebView architecture.
Thanks,
-ningxin
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:08 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
>
> Hey
>
> After debugging, I did some
Hey
After debugging, I did some minor updates to the plugin README. It
should be easier to get this up and running, although there's still
the issue of after-install hooks and the relative path weirdness with
the Crosswalk Library itself.
It still doesn't support the CLI at all, but it should be
(Sorry Joe, Googlers are down in California and way busy. Will be back in
a week. Super excited about this, though.)
-Michal
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> Reviving this thread!
>
> Can other people look at this, and see if/when we should land this? I
> know that I hav
Reviving this thread!
Can other people look at this, and see if/when we should land this? I
know that I have to re-write the tests still, but I would like some
feedback before merging it in. Also, it'd be super awesome if other
people could try and make a WebView based on the interfaces and
reco
Hey, I created the following today to track various WebView progresses:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6246
I also have this repo created. The licensing is ugly as all crap, but
it's a Proof-Of-Concept:
https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine
If I can get some help getting
Perhaps. There would be additional benefits to this approach, namely
fixes being added to that platform more quickly. I'll probably take a
look at that once I have Crosswalk finalized.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> this is great stuff
>
> do we think it may be possible t
Just added more code. I have the Cordova bridges working with
Crosswalk. The thing is that for us to do this, we have to expose a
lot of things that were previously not exposed, because I'm choosing
to not put the Crosswalk code in the same namespace for organizational
purposes.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2
this is great stuff
do we think it may be possible to bring in amazon fireos stuff eventually
too?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> BTW: I committed it in my repo, not the main Apache one.
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> > Hey
> >
> > I just committe
BTW: I committed it in my repo, not the main Apache one.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> Hey
>
> I just committed some code based on their WebView modifications that
> allows you to choose your renderer in the config file with this:
>
> value="org.apache.cordova.engine.cr
Hey
I just committed some code based on their WebView modifications that
allows you to choose your renderer in the config file with this:
You currently have to copy over the *.pak file and the jsapi from a
Crosswalk Example project to get this to work. The next thing that
I'm going to do i
https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-android
First patch they landed, which claims to have min viable xwalk webview:
https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-android/commit/a04dedeb0204e7542d190312c6ae70c795a26e04
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Michal Mocny wro
I haven't looked yet, but did you see:
https://crosswalk-project.org/#wiki/crosswalk-cordova-android
?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> First - very excited that you're working on this!
>
> Had a quick look. Not sure there's much to be gleaned yet. Once you start
> in on
First - very excited that you're working on this!
Had a quick look. Not sure there's much to be gleaned yet. Once you start
in on hooking up x-walk's webview I think it will become more obvious what
the interface should look like. E.g., does x-walk even have the concept of
ChromeClient vs WebViewC
87 matches
Mail list logo
