Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-21 Thread Jesse
Very nice, updated my fork, and I now see tests passing! Great work Sergey, Mark, and Daniel! @purplecabbage risingj.com On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Mark Koudritsky wrote: > It works now! Added AppVeyor badge to README. Thanks to Daniel Gruno from > the Apache INFRA team. >

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-21 Thread Mark Koudritsky
It works now! Added AppVeyor badge to README. Thanks to Daniel Gruno from the Apache INFRA team.

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-21 Thread Mark Koudritsky
Travis builds are up and running here https://travis-ci.org/apache/cordova-lib/builds For AppVeyor there is some problem (might be permissions, details in INFRA-8066 ). Sergey, did you have to check some special check boxes on AppVeyor to make the

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-21 Thread Mark Koudritsky
-Original Message- > From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:13 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Add build status to github > > I didn't. > I guess we also need to provide the INFRA people with some short > instr

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-19 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
Tests are now green on both Linux (Travis) and Windows (AppVeyor). Thx Mark! -Sergey -Original Message- From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:13 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: Add build status to github I didn't. I guess we also

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-18 Thread Mark Koudritsky
I didn't. I guess we also need to provide the INFRA people with some short instructions on how to enable this on the AppVeyor site. On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jesse wrote: > awesome! > Has anyone created an INFRA ticket for adding the github service hooks? > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-18 Thread Jesse
awesome! Has anyone created an INFRA ticket for adding the github service hooks? @purplecabbage risingj.com On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Mark Koudritsky wrote: > The test failure on Travis is in plugman/install spec. It seems to only > happen with a fresh checkout, once you run the test s

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-18 Thread Mark Koudritsky
The test failure on Travis is in plugman/install spec. It seems to only happen with a fresh checkout, once you run the test second time, it works ok. I was bitten by this before. Maybe something with bad management of temp dirs. I'll investigate. For now just removing that spec file "fixes" the bu

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-17 Thread Shazron
mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:53 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: RE: Add build status to github > > We require someone with github admin rights to login to both services using > github account and activate build for cordova-lib repo. T

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-17 Thread Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)
We would need to raise an INFRA ticket for this, right ? -Original Message- From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) [mailto:v-seg...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:53 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: Add build status to github We require someone with github admin

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-17 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
, 2014 5:42 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: Add build status to github +1 for running both, Travis and AppVeyor. What's needed in terms of setting up the hooks on GitHub side? Do we need in INFRA ticket for this? On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) <

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-17 Thread Mark Koudritsky
om: brian.ler...@gmail.com [mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Brian LeRoux > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:42 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Add build status to github > > I see, it looks like our testing infra is going to be redunant/distributed > reg

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-17 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
ay, July 15, 2014 9:42 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: Add build status to github I see, it looks like our testing infra is going to be redunant/distributed regardless. (travis + X) No sense in fighting it! On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) < p

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Brian LeRoux
4 9:18 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: RE: Add build status to github > > https://docs.saucelabs.com/reference/status-images/ > On Jul 15, 2014 9:17 AM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: > > > Or we could use SauceLabs (for all) > > On Jul 15, 2014 9:16

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:18 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: Add build status to github https://docs.saucelabs.com/reference/status-images/ On Jul 15, 2014 9:17 AM, "Brian LeRoux" wrote: > Or we could use SauceLabs (for all) > On Jul 15, 2014 9:16 AM, "Parashura

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Brian LeRoux
ld need both right? For covering Windows and Linux platforms for >> lib to build/run. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:55 AM >> To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> Subject: Re: A

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Brian LeRoux
om: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:55 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Add build status to github > > Ok, let's ask here. > > Does anybody have any strong preferences for either AppVeyor or TravisCI > or both for c

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)
My reasoning is to catch error that we may introduce due to concatenating paths, CRLF endings etc. -Original Message- From: Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:09 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: Add build status to github We would need both

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)
We would need both right? For covering Windows and Linux platforms for lib to build/run. -Original Message- From: Mark Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 7:55 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: Add build status to github Ok, let's ask

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Mark Koudritsky
Ok, let's ask here. Does anybody have any strong preferences for either AppVeyor or TravisCI or both for cordova-lib? note, this is only about running "npm test" in cordova-lib.

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-15 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
Koudritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 11:55 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: Add build status to github Sergey, can we set up AppVeyor to run the "npm test" of cordova-lib? If yes, it would be an excellent option - we will have cordova-lib jasmine tests

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-14 Thread Mark Koudritsky
cker it provides OSX > > test boxes with XCode installed ( > > http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/osx-ci-environment) and also supports > > Android builds (http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/android) > > > > Thx! > > Sergey > > -Original Message- &g

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-14 Thread Jesse
droid builds (http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/android) > > Thx! > Sergey > -Original Message- > From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) > Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 6:00 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: RE: Add build status to github > > Hey Mark, it is real

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-14 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
(http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/osx-ci-environment) and also supports Android builds (http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/android) Thx! Sergey -Original Message- From: Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 6:00 PM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: RE: Add build status

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-07 Thread Josh Soref
fwiw, I have a draft change [1] to how we run cordova-lib tests, we'd like to do this, but someone needs to spend the time creating a proper npm module (and repo?) for it. With the changes, it's possible to skip tests that can't run, e.g. If your computer doesn't have vs2013, we could skip (and re

RE: Add build status to github

2014-07-07 Thread Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
udritsky [mailto:kam...@google.com] Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 6:57 AM To: dev@cordova.apache.org Subject: Re: Add build status to github Oops, sorry, didn't look at the links before sending another link to AppVeyor. Why not to use AppVeyor for lib and cli too? We could definitely use some te

Re: Add build status to github

2014-07-03 Thread Mark Koudritsky
Oops, sorry, didn't look at the links before sending another link to AppVeyor. Why not to use AppVeyor for lib and cli too? We could definitely use some testing on windows. I also experimented with Wercker which is yet another free CI service. Added it to a branch in my fork

Re: Add build status to github

2014-06-27 Thread Andrew Grieve
Make it happen :) On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Mark Koudritsky wrote: > Would be nice to have this. Specifically Travis will only run on Linux (and > maybe OSX). Here is a random similar service I found that can also run on > windows. > http://www.appveyor.com/ >

Re: Add build status to github

2014-06-27 Thread Mark Koudritsky
Would be nice to have this. Specifically Travis will only run on Linux (and maybe OSX). Here is a random similar service I found that can also run on windows. http://www.appveyor.com/