I would retrieve the values once on start, and subscribe for updates.
Cache the latest value and pass it to js either when it changes or when the 2
seconds is about to expire.
> On May 14, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Alexander Sorokin (Akvelon)
> wrote:
>
> Hi, community.
>
> I am investigating devi
Unfortunate as we thought 2.6 was realistic a few weeks ago but I echo
the sentiment. Too soon! Going to kick up a fresh thread on JS.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Shazron wrote:
> I don't think it should go in for 2.6.0 as well, for the already mentioned
> reasons.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013
I don't think it should go in for 2.6.0 as well, for the already mentioned
reasons.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> I feel pretty strongly that we shouldn't try to shove this in for 2.6.0.
> Regressions only at this point (since the branches have been cut).
>
> Excited t
I feel pretty strongly that we shouldn't try to shove this in for 2.6.0.
Regressions only at this point (since the branches have been cut).
Excited to see progress here though!
by namespace - are you referring to Java namespaces? or plugin IDs?
To answer your question about the JS, refer to this
