Ray I really appreciate you helping to bridge the gap between cordova
developers and cordova's users. I think the work you do is very valuable
for our community! Thanks and keep it up!
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Ray Camden wrote:
> Josh, we have this discussion already. I was asking to qu
Josh, we have this discussion already. I was asking to quote Michal, not
you. I understand my blog entry may not be to your liking, but you are not
my audience. My audience (in this case) is PG/Cordova devs outside the
list. In fact, this thread started from a question asked on Twitter this
morning
Yes, you have my permission to quote, though I'm happy to have it be
presented as a summary without attribution as well.
-Michal
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Ray Camden wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed response Michal. With your permission, I¹d like to
> reprint this on my blog.
>
> I will
I'd like to repeat that I don't like quoting text in blogs.
It's unhelpful.
Writing a summary is much more helpful.
I do not want to be quoted.
Nor do I as a developer want to read/parse quotes. I do not want to spend
time parsing quotations/determining context.
As a developer, I want to know w
Thanks for the detailed response Michal. With your permission, I¹d like to
reprint this on my blog.
I will point out however that there was at least one time when the
directory structure change broke something. I forget which version it was
but at some point the CLI stopped making a .cordova folde
Having our cli and platform versions so similar is going to confuse people.
Lets skip version 4 and bump cli straight to version 10.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Ian Clelland
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Michal Mocny wrote:
>
>> The reason CLI is reporting that number is b
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Michal Mocny wrote:
> The reason CLI is reporting that number is because we tried to go semver in
> an odd way (CAD-SEM) and CLI version was supposed to be just the SEM part
> and the CAD was just informational -- which hasn't worked out so well. The
> next CLI r
The reason CLI is reporting that number is because we tried to go semver in
an odd way (CAD-SEM) and CLI version was supposed to be just the SEM part
and the CAD was just informational -- which hasn't worked out so well. The
next CLI release is going to drop the old SEM and turn the existing CAD
i
I¹m posting this here as opposed to the Google Group as it seems like the
type of thing that may have been discussed, then turned down, and I
figured this list was best to answer why.
Unless I¹m not seeing it, there is no way to tell what version of the CLI
was used to build a project. Oddly ³cord
