Upload handlers do not parse multipart form data.
-
Key: COUCHDB-939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-939
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: HTTP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929555#action_12929555
]
A. Bram Neijt commented on COUCHDB-924:
---
This bugs needs more clarification.
Please
Hi All,
I'm new at couchdb and was pointed towards the easy-issues. I think
the list needs some cleaning up, because it's hard see which issues
actually need work.
Here are some of the issues that seem to be closed/fixed from the list[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-811
Seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Lehnardt closed COUCHDB-811.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0
[error,unknown command] should be [fatal,unknown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Lehnardt updated COUCHDB-725:
-
Skill Level: Committers Level (Medium to Hard) (was: New Contributors
Level (Easy))
needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Lehnardt updated COUCHDB-920:
-
Skill Level: Committers Level (Medium to Hard) (was: New Contributors
Level (Easy))
BTree:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Lehnardt updated COUCHDB-922:
-
Skill Level: Committers Level (Medium to Hard) (was: New Contributors
Level (Easy))
Needs
On 26 Oct 2010, at 17:25, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Hi Bram,
On 26 Oct 2010, at 11:51, Bram Neijt wrote:
I'm a developer at Xebia and I've been granted about 5 hours a week to
spend on implementing any open source project problem I would
If your version of SpiderMonkey (used for the JavaScript view server)
supports JavaScript version 1.8.5, you can simply use the
Array.isArray() function.
Otherwise, here's an article describing the difficulties of detecting
whether an object is an array:
http://is.gd/gQ2i4
Cheers,
Zach
On Fri,
Hi Gabriel,
On 8 Nov 2010, at 17:13, Gabriel Farrell wrote:
Attempts to compile from HEAD on Github (at commit e9bf7b33c7),
following the DEVELOPERS doc, on my 64-bit Debian testing machine
resulted in the following error:
./mochifmt.erl:none: error in parse transform 'eunit_autoexport'
Hi everyone!
You've discussed earlier possibility of adding access validators to _design
documents, this feature it's a kind of thing that many couchdb users will be
glad to see.
The conclusion of previous discussion was that we can't add this validators,
because we actually won't be able to tell
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Joseph Davis resolved COUCHDB-917.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix typos in comments
-
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new at couchdb and was pointed towards the easy-issues. I think
the list needs some cleaning up, because it's hard see which issues
actually need work.
Here are some of the issues that seem to be closed/fixed
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 8 Nov 2010, at 17:13, Gabriel Farrell wrote:
Attempts to compile from HEAD on Github (at commit e9bf7b33c7),
following the DEVELOPERS doc, on my 64-bit Debian testing machine
resulted in the following error:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929640#action_12929640
]
Andrew Fresh commented on COUCHDB-924:
--
The problem is that the populate function
Configure should test for eUnit
---
Key: COUCHDB-940
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-940
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Build System
Reporter: A.
oh, this is probably my fault :(
B.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Bram Neijt bne...@gmail.com wrote:
I hit this problem as well and had it on my TODO :)
I've just now added this as a bug[1] to the easy list.
Thanks for reporting!
Bram
[1]
Whoops. Hit send too early, but I think I got everything in there that
I wanted to say.
As for the ref counter bottleneck, I just pushed to
https://github.com/tilgovi/couchdb/tree/ets_ref_count
This branch uses a public ets for the ref_counter. I think I managed
to linear the updates over the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929707#action_12929707
]
Chas Emerick commented on COUCHDB-682:
--
I'm *thrilled* that this has finally been
Make CouchDB benefit more from ETag caching
---
Key: COUCHDB-941
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-941
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Database Core
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Hit send too early, but I think I got everything in there that
I wanted to say.
As for the ref counter bottleneck, I just pushed to
https://github.com/tilgovi/couchdb/tree/ets_ref_count
This branch uses a
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:22, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops. Hit send too early, but I think I got everything in there that
I wanted to say.
As for the ref counter bottleneck, I just pushed to
On 8 Nov 2010, at 20:47, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
On Nov 8, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Others: did a recent upgrade of Mochiweb introduce an unwanted
dependency on EUnit? :)
Yes, Mochiweb started using eunit for testing recently.
Do we want to take this on as a dependency or
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Turns out we just need to add -DNOTEST to the erlc calls when building
mochiweb or define -define(NOTEST, 1). early enough
(http://svn.process-one.net/contribs/trunk/eunit/doc/overview-summary.html#Disabling_testing).
I can make it optional. I'm working a mochiweb patch to send upstream first.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Robert Newson robert.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Turns out we just need to add -DNOTEST to the erlc calls when
On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:22, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com
wrote:
Whoops. Hit send too early, but I think I got everything in there that
I wanted to say.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929871#action_12929871
]
Adam Kocoloski commented on COUCHDB-920:
I hear ya, but I disagree about doing it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dale Harvey updated COUCHDB-912:
Attachment: attachment_permissions.js
anon.patch
Anonymous Access to Design Docs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dale Harvey updated COUCHDB-912:
Attachment: (was: anon.patch)
Anonymous Access to Design Docs on private DB's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dale Harvey updated COUCHDB-912:
Attachment: (was: anon.patch)
Anonymous Access to Design Docs on private DB's
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 17:18, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:22, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com
wrote:
Whoops. Hit send
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 17:35, sgoto samuelg...@gmail.com wrote:
does anyone knows who maintains the installation scripts at
http://www.couch.io/get#ubuntu ?
can we create an installer with the 1.0.1 version (due to the bugs on 1.0.0)
?
sam
--
f u cn rd ths u cn b a gd prgmr !
It looks
Yes, sorry it was not clear, but it's exactly like you're saying.
So my proposal is:
Add *validate_doc_view* function in _design documents with arguments like *doc,
userCtx, req*.
Add *validate_view_access* function into _design/views/view_name with
arguments like *req, userCtx*.
Example:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929918#action_12929918
]
Dale Harvey commented on COUCHDB-912:
-
I have redone the patch thanks to Filipes
34 matches
Mail list logo
