Congratulations, Jay! Welcome, and well deserved!
---
Eric
> On Jan 8, 2019, at 19:16, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> Congratulations, Jay, and Happy New Year!
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:11 AM Joan Touzet wrote:
>>
>> Dear community,
>>
>> I am pleased to
+1
> On Dec 20, 2018, at 04:55, Jay Doane wrote:
>
> Currently, CouchDB requires at least OTP 17 or later to build and run
> [1][2]. However, recent work undertaken to eliminate compiler warnings
> [3][4] has highlighted the additional effort needed to continue to support
> older Erlang
+1
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:58, Joan Touzet wrote:
>
> Requesting lazy consensus - does anyone have a problem with them
> starting the process to mass-migrate all of the remaining repos to
> gitbox?
>
> This means integrated access and easy PRs on repos like couchdb-admin,
> couchdb-ets-lru,
Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic)
sig: ok
sha256: ok
sha512: ok
Deps installed with install-dependencies.sh from
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-ci
All tests pass. Had to rerun js tests because of emfile.
Manual testing with curl: start cluster, create db, bulk add docs, add a view,
query view, delete
Dear all,
I’d like to hear your opinion on how we should interpret a database attribute
“active size”.
As you surely know we are using three different size attributes in a database
info: file - the size of the database file on disk; external - the uncompressed
size of database contents and
the way, with my PMC hat on, you should unassign this issue
>> from yourself unless you're actively working on it *right now*.)
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Eiri"
>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 8:15:21 AM
Hi all,
It is my understanding that a current implementation of view changes in mrview
is conceptually broken. I heard from Robert Newson that he and Benjamin Bastian
found that some time ago doing testing with deletion and recreation of docs
emitting same keys in the views.
I propose to
Hi Garth,
Stats are node specific, so they are on nodes interface
/_node/{node@name}/_stats in 2.0, e.g. /_node/node1@127.0.0.1/_stats
Regards,
Eric
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 15:26, Garth Gutenberg wrote:
>
> When I try hitting localhost:5984/_stats I get:
>
>
CentOS 7.2, erlang 17.5
Verified sig and checksums, all is good, though sha256sum (version 8.22)
doesn’t like format of apache-couchdb-2.0.0.tar.gz.sha256 file
`make check` passed. I ran some simple tests: created db, added and updated a
couple of docs, deleted db, replicated db from Couch 1.6
Hi Joey,
Does the invalid json you are seeing looks like it described in this issue's
comment?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-3060?focusedCommentId=15436912=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15436912
Github user eiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch-log-lager/pull/2#discussion_r56441052
--- Diff: src/couch_log_lager.erl ---
@@ -64,10 +64,9 @@ emergency(Fmt, Args) ->
-spec set_level(atom()) -> ok.
set_level
Github user eiri commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch-log-lager/pull/2#issuecomment-197638745
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user eiri commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/pull/54#issuecomment-106033350
@hdiedrich Yes I understand the question and link in my previous answer is
pointing to the code point. It's populated on `couch_db_updater` init
GitHub user eiri opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/pull/54
Fix `active_size` format conversion in `get_db_info` function
In `active_size` conversion in `couch_db:get_db_info/1` old db reduction's
size format assumed to be an integer representing active
Github user eiri commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/pull/54#issuecomment-105523469
@kxepal I can reproduce it by migrating a test database from DBCore to
CouchDB 2.0, but I doubt it could be shown in migration from CouchDB 1.6.x to
2.0, as far as I
Github user eiri commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/pull/54#issuecomment-105577336
@hdiedrich : in
[couch_db_updater.erl](https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/blob/master/src/couch_db_updater.erl#L492)
It's the same in DBCore's
Github user eiri commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-couch/pull/54#issuecomment-105529725
@kxepal I don't think simple copy would do, given the database file going
to be named as a shard. I thought of something like creating test db for 1.x,
creating
GitHub user eiri opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/couchdb-ets-lru/pull/1
Migrate the tests from etap to eunit
All the etap tests converted to eunit. The tests for the validating
of the correct handeling of the bad options for LRU are re-enabled
18 matches
Mail list logo