Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-08 Thread Nolan Lawson
e couch test suite. >>>>>> >>>>>> It’s just that a CouchDB 2.0 cluster is an AP system, and recreating >>>> databases >>>>>> in quick succession reliably basically requires a CA system and >> that’s >>>> not what can do eas

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-03 Thread Russell Branca
hope I got the CAP letters right, but I think it is clear what I > > > mean) > > > >> > > > >> That is, maybe we skip those tests when run against a CouchDB 2.0 > > > endpoint and keep them for PouchDB? > > > >> > > > >> Be

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Nolan Lawson
> > >> > > >>> > > >>> On 2 September 2016 at 10:31, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi Nolan, Will: > > >>>> > > >>>> A further update from looking deeper with @

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Dale Harvey
gt;>> Hi Nolan, Will: > >>>> > >>>> A further update from looking deeper with @janl. It appears that we > >>>> have a pending fix for COUCHDB-3017 and we'll work on getting that > >>>> merged before 2.0. > >>>> > >

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
ting that >>>> merged before 2.0. >>>> >>>> COUCHDB-3034 is a WONTFIX. FYI in CouchDB itself we changed all of >>>> our tests to use unique database names. I'll update the bug myself >>>> shortly. >>>> >>>> -Joan >>>

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Will Holley
I'll update the bug myself >>> shortly. >>> >>> -Joan >>> >>> - Original Message - >>>> From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org> >>>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org >>>> Sent: Friday, September

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Jan Lehnardt
ly. >> >> -Joan >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org> >>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org >>> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 5:15:00 AM >>> Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs >

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Dale Harvey
database names. I'll update the bug myself > shortly. > > -Joan > > - Original Message - > > From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org> > > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 5:15:00 AM > > Subject: Re: G

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Joan Touzet
the bug myself shortly. -Joan - Original Message - > From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org> > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 5:15:00 AM > Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs > > Hi Will, > > Neither of these

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Will Holley
? > > -Joan > > - Original Message - >> From: "Will Holley" <willhol...@gmail.com> >> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org> >> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 4:43:48 AM >> Subject: Re: Getting librari

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Joan Touzet
? -Joan - Original Message - > From: "Will Holley" <willhol...@gmail.com> > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org> > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 4:43:48 AM > Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs > >

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-02 Thread Will Holley
chDB knowledge so I'm hoping you can give us a short > summary of what you think is wrong. > > All the best, > Joan > > - Original Message - >> From: "Nolan Lawson" <no...@nolanlawson.com> >> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org >> Sent: Thursday, S

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-01 Thread Joan Touzet
is wrong. All the best, Joan - Original Message - > From: "Nolan Lawson" <no...@nolanlawson.com> > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:56:42 PM > Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs > > We have been testing CouchD

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-09-01 Thread Nolan Lawson
We have been testing CouchDB master in PouchDB for months now, but as an allowed failure because I believe it’s failing for known reasons. We test both using Node.js and the browser. Node: https://travis-ci.org/pouchdb/pouchdb/jobs/156198210 Browser:

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-08-29 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Anyone on this list who could help with this? The work items are fairly self-explanatory and not very big individually <3 Best Jan -- > On 10 Aug 2016, at 09:37, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > from Joan’s excellent blog post about testing Release Candidates: > >>

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-08-10 Thread Jan Lehnardt
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 09:40, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > Good concern. Indeed noone needs a database without clients > ready-to-go. From our side it would be good to have nano updated /as > well as jquery.couch/. Yes for nano. I think we are deprecating jquery.couch, because

Re: Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-08-10 Thread Alexander Shorin
Good concern. Indeed noone needs a database without clients ready-to-go. From our side it would be good to have nano updated /as well as jquery.couch/. -- ,,,^..^,,, On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Hey everyone, > > from Joan’s excellent blog post about

Getting libraries to test RCs

2016-08-10 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hey everyone, from Joan’s excellent blog post about testing Release Candidates: > To our valued CouchDB application and library developers: please, please run > your software against each of the options below. — https://blog.couchdb.org/2016/08/08/release-candidates/ I think we can be a