e couch test suite.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s just that a CouchDB 2.0 cluster is an AP system, and recreating
>>>> databases
>>>>>> in quick succession reliably basically requires a CA system and
>> that’s
>>>> not what can do eas
hope I got the CAP letters right, but I think it is clear what I
> > > mean)
> > > >>
> > > >> That is, maybe we skip those tests when run against a CouchDB 2.0
> > > endpoint and keep them for PouchDB?
> > > >>
> > > >> Be
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2 September 2016 at 10:31, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Nolan, Will:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A further update from looking deeper with @
gt;>> Hi Nolan, Will:
> >>>>
> >>>> A further update from looking deeper with @janl. It appears that we
> >>>> have a pending fix for COUCHDB-3017 and we'll work on getting that
> >>>> merged before 2.0.
> >>>>
> >
ting that
>>>> merged before 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> COUCHDB-3034 is a WONTFIX. FYI in CouchDB itself we changed all of
>>>> our tests to use unique database names. I'll update the bug myself
>>>> shortly.
>>>>
>>>> -Joan
>>>
I'll update the bug myself
>>> shortly.
>>>
>>> -Joan
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
>>>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
>>>> Sent: Friday, September
ly.
>>
>> -Joan
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
>>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
>>> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 5:15:00 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs
>
database names. I'll update the bug myself
> shortly.
>
> -Joan
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
> > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 5:15:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: G
the bug myself
shortly.
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 5:15:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs
>
> Hi Will,
>
> Neither of these
?
>
> -Joan
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Will Holley" <willhol...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 4:43:48 AM
>> Subject: Re: Getting librari
?
-Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Will Holley" <willhol...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 4:43:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs
>
>
chDB knowledge so I'm hoping you can give us a short
> summary of what you think is wrong.
>
> All the best,
> Joan
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Nolan Lawson" <no...@nolanlawson.com>
>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, S
is wrong.
All the best,
Joan
- Original Message -
> From: "Nolan Lawson" <no...@nolanlawson.com>
> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:56:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs
>
> We have been testing CouchD
We have been testing CouchDB master in PouchDB for months now, but as an
allowed failure because I believe it’s failing for known reasons. We test both
using Node.js and the browser.
Node: https://travis-ci.org/pouchdb/pouchdb/jobs/156198210
Browser:
Anyone on this list who could help with this? The work items are fairly
self-explanatory and not very big individually <3
Best
Jan
--
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 09:37, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> from Joan’s excellent blog post about testing Release Candidates:
>
>>
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 09:40, Alexander Shorin wrote:
>
> Good concern. Indeed noone needs a database without clients
> ready-to-go. From our side it would be good to have nano updated /as
> well as jquery.couch/.
Yes for nano.
I think we are deprecating jquery.couch, because
Good concern. Indeed noone needs a database without clients
ready-to-go. From our side it would be good to have nano updated /as
well as jquery.couch/.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> from Joan’s excellent blog post about
Hey everyone,
from Joan’s excellent blog post about testing Release Candidates:
> To our valued CouchDB application and library developers: please, please run
> your software against each of the options below.
— https://blog.couchdb.org/2016/08/08/release-candidates/
I think we can be a
18 matches
Mail list logo