I hope I did not miss something, but is there a list somewhere which repos
do exist now?
Thanks for help !
Cheers
Andy
On 5 February 2014 00:06, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Andy Wenk a...@nms.de wrote:
I hope I did not miss something, but is there a list somewhere which repos
do exist now?
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?s=couchdb
--
,,,^..^,,,
Not sure it matters, to be honest, whether someone mistakes
couchdb-docs for an Erlang module for handling JSON documents. This is
the last email I will send on this, because bike shed painting is
something of a vice for me.
On 5 February 2014 10:39, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Wow. couchdb-documentation is very long! Why not couchdb-docs? :)
+1 for -docs...
While -docs looks nicer and sounds shorter (and I'm also +1 for
Wow. couchdb-documentation is very long! Why not couchdb-docs? :)
Anyway, you can probably dispense with make. Just get a decent Sphinx
thing set up.
On 29 January 2014 11:18, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Paul, this question might be most up to you, but may be any other
docs is ambiguous and might refer to medical professionals.
B.
On 30 Jan 2014, at 12:26, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Wow. couchdb-documentation is very long! Why not couchdb-docs? :)
Anyway, you can probably dispense with make. Just get a decent Sphinx
thing set up.
On 29
Similarly, documentation might refer to documentation *about*
medical professionals.
I suggest couchdb-the-repository-for-documentation-about-couchdb-itself.
On 30 January 2014 13:56, Robert Samuel Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
docs is ambiguous and might refer to medical professionals.
B.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Wow. couchdb-documentation is very long! Why not couchdb-docs? :)
+1 for -docs...
Anyway, you can probably dispense with make. Just get a decent Sphinx
thing set up.
Sphinx kind of provides a Makefile by default, and it's
Ah yes, what I really mean is we can dispense with Autotoools. :)
On 30 January 2014 14:08, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Wow. couchdb-documentation is very long! Why not couchdb-docs? :)
+1 for -docs...
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Wow. couchdb-documentation is very long! Why not couchdb-docs? :)
+1 for -docs...
Anyway, you can probably dispense with make. Just get a
Hi all,
Paul, this question might be most up to you, but may be any other
knows the answer.
1) What git-magic commands should I enter to fill
couchdb-documentation[1] repository with
preserving(?) commit history of share/doc but only?
2) Have I keep current directory structure for it?
3) How
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Alexander Shorin kxe...@gmail.com wrote:
1) What git-magic commands should I enter to fill
couchdb-documentation[1] repository with
preserving(?) commit history of share/doc but only?
This should work:
That stack overflow question was mostly how I ran things. I used a
branch called import instead of master though.
Don't worry about rebar for the build system. Just make sure you can
run a simple make or similar in the docs repo to build things and
we'll figure out the release build side of
Thanks Dirkjan and Paul for the instructions!
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Paul Davis
paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote:
That stack overflow question was mostly how I ran things. I used a
branch called import instead of master though.
Don't worry about rebar for the build
14 matches
Mail list logo
