Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-05 Thread Filipe David Manana
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > have previous releases shipped with these mochiweb bugs? Not mochiweb, ibrowse :) Maybe, but I think some parts of ibrowse were rewritten for release 2.0.0. > > I'm a bit equivocal on whether we should hold 1.0.2 up for these now. > > On Wed

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-05 Thread Robert Newson
have previous releases shipped with these mochiweb bugs? I'm a bit equivocal on whether we should hold 1.0.2 up for these now. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Filipe David Manana > wrote: >> I'm now -1 on it until Ibrowse issue >> ht

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-05 Thread Filipe David Manana
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > I'm now -1 on it until Ibrowse issue > https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues#issue/24 is fixed. It > affects push replications only. > However a new Ibrowse release is going to be made very soon (today or > tomorrow), perhaps w

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-05 Thread Filipe David Manana
I'm now -1 on it until Ibrowse issue https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues#issue/24 is fixed. It affects push replications only. However a new Ibrowse release is going to be made very soon (today or tomorrow), perhaps with that exact patch. So should be pretty quick. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 a

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread Randall Leeds
+1 on getting this release out the door. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:56, till wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: >>> Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever >>> happened to it? Does i

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread till
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: >> Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever >> happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? >> >> I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread Filipe David Manana
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:15 PM, till wrote: > Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever > happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? > > I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? Till, I think that is planned to go into 1

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:15, till wrote: > Kind of related -- anyone remember the futon work Mikeal did. Whatever > happened to it? Does it address those issues as well? > > I don't want to stall the release but is Mikeal's work more a 1.1.x feature? IIRC it was slated for 1.2. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread till
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, till wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis >>> wrote: Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that COUCHDB

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, till wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis >> wrote: >>> Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that >>> COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. >>>

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:09 AM, till wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that >> COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. >> Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread Filipe David Manana
Ok to me. On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that > COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. > Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm > inclined to just reassign

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:09 AM, till wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis > wrote: >> Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that >> COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. >> Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-04 Thread till
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that > COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. > Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm > inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x.

Re: Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-03 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that > COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. > Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm > inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x.

Preparing 1.0.2 release.

2011-01-03 Thread Paul Davis
Anyone have an objection to me calling a 1.0.2 vote? Now that COUCHDB-968 and COUCHDB-999 are fixed we have finished the blockers. Though I now see that there's an issue [1] listed under 1.0.2 but I'm inclined to just reassign it to 1.1.x. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-998