Okay, cool. :)
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
It's currently the case, yes. We can read 0.10.0 onwards, I think.
What I think we *can* promise is that we'll read 1.0.0
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Robert Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
It's currently the case, yes. We can read 0.10.0 onwards, I think.
What I think we *can* promise is that we'll read 1.0.0 onwards for the
forseeable future. If that changes, then that upgrade is the one that will
need
From 1.0.0 onwards we promise to support forward migration of database and view
files, we shouldn't be introducing any breaking changes that prevent any future
couchdb release from reading .couch files from 1.0.0 or any release hence. The
versioned database dir pattern must have been useful in
In my experience of Debian, when you upgrade Postgres or MySQL from one
version to another, you actually have different packages. So postgres2.3,
postgres2.4, etc. Which means, because of how Debian works, you're getting
different directories right out of the box. (Though, they may share the
same
It's currently the case, yes. We can read 0.10.0 onwards, I think.
What I think we *can* promise is that we'll read 1.0.0 onwards for the
forseeable future. If that changes, then that upgrade is the one that will need
extra care and attention.
B.
On 12 Sep 2012, at 11:36, Noah Slater wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
Randall,
Sorry for the very late reply (doing some long overdue email sprints).
Absolutely no worries. I've been doing a bit of the same myself. And
if you hadn't noticed, I haven't been hacking on couch much in the
last
Randall,
Sorry for the very late reply (doing some long overdue email sprints).
What did you do about this in the end?
I was the one who designed that scheme for Debian, so I can, at least, let
you know the thinking behind it.
I was concerned about an update to CouchDB breaking, or corrupting,
+1.
On 6 April 2012 22:52, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote:
The deb packaging I pulled from downstream has the following:
Apache CouchDB is alpha software and still under heavy development. Please be
aware that important areas such as the public API or internal database format
The deb packaging I pulled from downstream has the following:
Apache CouchDB is alpha software and still under heavy development. Please be
aware that important areas such as the public API or internal database format
may see backwards incompatible changes between versions.
...
The partitioned
