couch_config_writer.erl: meaning of single backslash in regular expression

2011-04-08 Thread Andrey Somov
Hi all, the line 34 of couch_config_writer.erl ( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/trunk/src/couchdb/couch_config_writer.erl ) contains a regular expression: {ok, Pattern} = re:compile([^(, Key, \\s*=)|\\[[a-zA-Z0-9\_-]*\\]]), What does the single backslash mean (\_)? When I remove it the

Re: couch_config_writer.erl: meaning of single backslash in regular expression

2011-04-08 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 13:16, Andrey Somov trophyb...@googlemail.com wrote: {ok, Pattern} = re:compile([^(, Key, \\s*=)|\\[[a-zA-Z0-9\_-]*\\]]), What does the single backslash mean (\_)? When I remove it the tests still succeed. (to be precise they fail in the same way as with the single

Re: CouchDB in a Jiffy

2011-04-08 Thread Filipe David Manana
Awesome work Paul! :) On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Paul Davis paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com wrote: Or rather Jiffy in CouchDB. I've created a branch on GitHub that includes my new JSON parser. It appears to have introduced a failing test case in the view_errors test case but other than that

Re: couch_config_writer.erl: meaning of single backslash in regular expression

2011-04-08 Thread Andrey Somov
I was asking the question because I was not sure whether the Erlang's dialect has a special meaning for escaped underscore. I am afraid it is just a minor bug. Shall I create an issue ? - Andrey On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at

1.1.0

2011-04-08 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hey all, We're down to two recognised issues for 1.1.0: http://s.apache.org/couchdb-open-issues-1.1.0 This is awesome! Thanks everybody for helping making this happen. If you feel you have any input on either, please speak up :) Equally, if you feel we should address anything else for

1.0.3

2011-04-08 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Heyall, there are a bunch of tricky bugfixes in the 1.0.x branch that are not in any release. I'm most concerned about the R14B02 ets/timer issue and the replication supervisor and I'd like to see these fixes in users' hands soonish. Is there anything else you think should be in 1.0.3? Are

Re: 1.0.3

2011-04-08 Thread Randall Leeds
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 14:38, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: Heyall, there are a bunch of tricky bugfixes in the 1.0.x branch that are not in any release. I'm most concerned about the R14B02 ets/timer issue and the replication supervisor and I'd like to see these fixes in users'

Re: 1.0.3

2011-04-08 Thread Robert Newson
+1 the r14b02 breakage is ridiculous, though. B. On 8 April 2011 22:53, Randall Leeds randall.le...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 14:38, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote: Heyall, there are a bunch of tricky bugfixes in the 1.0.x branch that are not in any release. I'm most

Broken build

2011-04-08 Thread Paul Davis
Apparently the initial ejson commit has been building on our build-bot instance for about four days. The commit info can be found at [1]. Bottom line is that something hit an infinite loop spewing: sed: couldn't flush stdout: Broken pipe Don't bother trying to read the stdio log, its 44M of

Re: Broken build

2011-04-08 Thread Adam Kocoloski
On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Paul Davis wrote: Apparently the initial ejson commit has been building on our build-bot instance for about four days. The commit info can be found at [1]. Bottom line is that something hit an infinite loop spewing: sed: couldn't flush stdout: Broken pipe