dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-whisker/pull/136
Bumps commons-io:commons-io from 2.15.1 to 2.16.0.
[![Dependabot compatibility
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/231
Bumps commons-io:commons-io from 2.15.1 to 2.16.0.
[![Dependabot compatibility
RAT-355 started as a way to dump the running configuration so users could
verify what they have configured. This led to the necessity of being able
to dump the license definitions. This is the second iteration of the code
and uses an annotation to describe the components (Licenses and Matchers).
SPDX[1] has an interesting format where they can report 2 (or more?)
licenses in one.
There are a couple of things here that we will need to look at:
1. Metadata only stores one matching license.
2. Can we modify the output XML to list multiple licenses for a file
without too much
Hi,
Am 28.03.24 um 09:41 schrieb Claude Warren:
I got back to looking at 366 and discovered a problem that I think has been
lurking in the system for some time. Basically, if a file has the
signatures for more than one license only one will be reported, and the
selection of which one is (I
I got back to looking at 366 and discovered a problem that I think has been
lurking in the system for some time. Basically, if a file has the
signatures for more than one license only one will be reported, and the
selection of which one is (I think) random.
The CI build for RAT-366 shows a test
Claudenw commented on PR #205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/205#issuecomment-2024506086
Closing in favor of #227 which has a better solution
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
Claudenw closed pull request #205: RAT-355: Add configuration dump to report
URL: https://github.com/apache/creadur-rat/pull/205
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.