Sorry to weigh in so late on this -- just returned from vacation. If we
want to have a one release delay before making dictionary2 default for
testing/documentation/configuration purposes, and there isn't an obvious
function-related name, and the main difference is speed, maybe we could
call it
I'm making some significant updates to trunk that may cause some instability
for this release.
It should be mostly transparent, but let me know if you encounter any issues
with trunk.
Also, regarding the dictionary-lookup2. If there are no strong objections, we
can leave default to as-is (old
+1
Dima
On Jun 16, 2014, at 9:42, Miller, Timothy
timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
Sorry to weigh in so late on this -- just returned from vacation. If we
want to have a one release delay before making dictionary2 default for
testing/documentation/configuration purposes, and
VJ,
Just an fyi, I just ran the script to apply the standard ASF license header
files to the ytex source files (.sql, .xml, .java, .jsp, .bat, etc.) in
trunk
This will allow us to pass the Apache RAT checks...
(For those who are curious, our mvn license:check and license:format will
do it
I guess that I've got one question at this point:
Is the name being given to the -new- dictionary lookup module temporary or
permanent?
I was under the assumption that it was temporary and that with the switch to it
being default (and eventually only) the module would simply be named