Differences in MedicationMention annotations on subsequent processing runs

2014-10-08 Thread Bruce Tietjen
I have encountered a situation in which the cTakes clinical pipeline output differs between multiple runs on the same text with the same configuration. The following snippets from a single document are sufficient to demonstrate the issue: a gentle curve going into. irrigated with Bacitracin.

RE: Differences in MedicationMention annotations on subsequent processing runs

2014-10-08 Thread Finan, Sean
Hi Bruce, I would venture to say that this is neither expected nor desired. Before you fix it (or in addition to a fix), try to run with the new dictionary lookup. It will have a different behavior, and it will be the default dictionary lookup in future releases of cTakes – making fixes to

Re: Differences in MedicationMention annotations on subsequent processing runs

2014-10-08 Thread Bruce Tietjen
If I understand correctly, I would need new dictionary resources to run the rare word lookup method. Where can I find the necessary dictionary(ies) or how do I build them? [image: IMAT Solutions] http://imatsolutions.com Bruce Tietjen Senior Software Engineer [image: Mobile:] 801.634.1547

RE: Differences in MedicationMention annotations on subsequent processing runs

2014-10-08 Thread Finan, Sean
Good point ... I tried to check in to sourceforge but had problems. I will try again right now ... Building a custom dictionary is possible with the DictionaryTool in cTakes sandbox, but that is a different rabbit hole. -Original Message- From: Bruce Tietjen

RE: Differences in MedicationMention annotations on subsequent processing runs

2014-10-08 Thread Finan, Sean
Hi Bruce, With Pei's help I just updated the sourceforge repo with the cTakes dictionaries. Checkout artifact ctakes-resources-snomed-rword-hsqldb-2011ab Sean -Original Message- From: Bruce Tietjen [mailto:bruce.tiet...@perfectsearchcorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:52