normal engagements, which is always nice.
Cheers,
Sean
From: John Green [mailto:john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 5:30 PM
To: Finan, Sean
Cc: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sundry; Problem Lists
Thank you Sean for taking the time to respond to me, it was much
From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 7:26 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: RE: Sundry; Problem Lists
Last point: I seem to be interested in a current encounter (the now) and
diagnosis, the article seems to be interested in an arguably just
would possibly be a
route to a solution.
Now that is a challenge!
Cheers for the inspiration and enthusiasm,
Sean
From: John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 10:45 AM
To: Finan, Sean
Subject: RE: Sundry; Problem Lists
Oh goodness
,
Sean
--
*From:* John Green [john.travis.gr...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, November 04, 2013 10:45 AM
*To:* Finan, Sean
*Subject:* RE: Sundry; Problem Lists
Oh goodness no, I didnt think that at all! Im so new to the field of
NLP, anything and everything helps
Thanks! I will look at both. JG
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Finan, Sean
sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
I don't know if what I write below truly applies to the discussion, but
here it is.
much of a problem list definition may already be contained to varying
degrees
in
Sean - quick note: after looking at the above two resources, a couple of
points. The first resource confirms what I expected, that the vocabulary
exists in ctakes. The second confirms what I suspected: that novel approaches
to ordering and identification of top members of a problem list are
Last point: I seem to be interested in a current encounter (the now) and
diagnosis, the article seems to be interested in an arguably just as useful
tool, the longitudinal problem list (the ever), though very different I would
think in approach.
Thoughts?
Jg
—
Sent from Mailbox
