Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/140
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cammckenzie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/140#issuecomment-202669736
Looks OK to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user Randgalt commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/140#issuecomment-202669627
I updated the method doc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user cammckenzie commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/140#issuecomment-202668460
Looks like an OK short fix to me. We probably need to document the new
contract (call waitForInitialCreate before calling setData) somewhere?
---
If your project
Github user cammckenzie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/140#discussion_r57663793
--- Diff:
curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/nodes/PersistentNode.java
---
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ public String
Github user Randgalt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/140#discussion_r57663645
--- Diff:
curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/nodes/PersistentNode.java
---
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ public String
Github user cammckenzie commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/140#discussion_r57663597
--- Diff:
curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/nodes/PersistentNode.java
---
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ public String
