I got swamped. I'll get there eventually.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Benson Margulies [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The recent change of possible relevance is to make asynchronous operations
against the simulated browser be really asynchronous.
This particular test is the one I labored over
On Thursday 07 August 2008 7:34:49 am Benson Margulies wrote:
I got swamped. I'll get there eventually.
No problem. I through a System.gc() in there and the problem became much
less apparent so it isn't bothing me as much. :-) Maybe 10% from top
level. It's probably not really related
I'm having trouble with the CXF policy framework, which is causing a
little bit of grief. I think this is a developer, as opposed to a
user issue, as I /think/ it points to a bug in the policy framework.
If not, I can migrate the conversation to the users list.
What I'm finding is that
Fred Dushin-3 wrote:
But regardless, should the effective policy on the response be the
same as the effective policy on the request? Or should policy
assertion implementors code their interceptors to handle the response
chain, as well as the request?
Does WS-SecurityPolicy have
