On Monday 27 October 2008 2:02:14 pm Christian Schneider wrote:
> Daniel Kulp schrieb:
> > It could, but HTTP and CORBA performance would certainly suffer and the
> > number of threads blocked on requests in the sync cases would double.
> > Since part of what I'm trying to do is eliminate/reduc
Daniel Kulp schrieb:
Btw. is it really necessary to do different things for sync and async?
Of course the ClientImpl has to support a sync and async mode but I think
the transports could be made completely async. Does the Exchange even
has to know if it is synchronous?
It could, but HTTP a
On Saturday 25 October 2008 1:45:49 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> log4j is a lot easier to reconfigure than j.u.l. No -D, just a file in
> classpath.
>
> Could I persuade everyone else that it would make sense to have
> AbstractCXFTest turn on the log4j logging shim?
log4j isn't on the classpath fo
On Sunday 26 October 2008 9:01:44 am Christian Schneider wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I have looked into ClientImpl and JMSConduit. I think the code you added
> should work.
> The JMSConduit.onMessage is called from DefaultMessageListenerContainer
> which uses a spring TaskExecutor. Additionally it can be
On Monday 27 October 2008 8:13:18 am Benson Margulies wrote:
> Someone fixed a PMD issue for me and I never got a broken build email.
Yea. I think the machine went down again sometime last week. I've just
restarted it.
That said, it will probably be taken down again sometime in the next c
Someone fixed a PMD issue for me and I never got a broken build email.
