Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.12

2009-07-30 Thread Eoghan Glynn
+1 /Eoghan 2009/7/29 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org: This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.12 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.0.11 release.   Over 32 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.0.12 *Note:* as announced earlier this

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.6

2009-07-30 Thread Eoghan Glynn
+1 /Eoghan 2009/7/29 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org: This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.6 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.1.5 release.   Over 74 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.1.6 List of issues: The Maven staging

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.6

2009-07-30 Thread Sean O'Callaghan
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 29 July 2009 18:54 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.6 This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.6 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.3

2009-07-30 Thread Sean O'Callaghan
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 29 July 2009 18:56 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.3 his is a vote to release CXF 2.2.3 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the

RE: JSON in CXF

2009-07-30 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Gary I added a simple test confirming Jettison can output the data meeting the natural notation criteria. I thought I'd need to add a simple STAX writer wrapper (which is something one can easily do now with JSONProvider anyway whenever one wants to customize somehow the output being

Re: Reusing CXF DataBindings in the JAX-RS implementation

2009-07-30 Thread Daniel Kulp
I think what might make sense for a short term binary compatible type approach is to add a new interface like ClassSetDataBinding or something that defines the init(...) method that is needed for JAXRS. JAX-RS can then do instanceof on the databinding to see if it WILL work for it. That

Re: Reusing CXF DataBindings in the JAX-RS implementation

2009-07-30 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi I think what might make sense for a short term binary compatible type approach is to add a new interface like ClassSetDataBinding or something that defines the init(...) method that is needed for JAXRS. JAX-RS can then do instanceof on the databinding to see if it WILL work for it.

Re: Reusing CXF DataBindings in the JAX-RS implementation

2009-07-30 Thread Daniel Kulp
Basically, I think we should have: interface PropertiesInitializedDataBinding extends Databinding { void initialize(MapString, Object properties); } Then, we make our AbstractDataBinding implement that interface and add a method like: void initialize(MapString, Object properties) {

Re: Reusing CXF DataBindings in the JAX-RS implementation

2009-07-30 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
I'd prefer not to have a bunch of different init(..) methods on the interface itself that everyone HAS to implement. Ok, given this argument, I'm happy with having a single void initialize(MapString, Object properties) I guess I could've argued that perhaps only DataBindings shipped with CXF

Re: SOAP/TCP project status...

2009-07-30 Thread Daniel Kulp
Krzysztof, I've FINALLY had a chance to look at this. I've gone ahead and added it into the soap binding and wired it into the normal soap transport.It's definitely a good start. Still plenty of work to do, but the simple case is working. I've even tested it a bit with the Sun