Hi
After updating the source and rebuilding the workspace I can see 'src/test'
being sorted before 'src/main'. I'm wondering, what might've caused it ?
cheers, Sergey
I can't also run a JAXRS test in Eclipse which depends on AOP aspects, for some reasons aspectj is not added to the list of
libraries even though it's in the list of dependencies in pom.xml...
cheers, Sergey
- Original Message -
From: Sergey Beryozkin sbery...@progress.com
To:
The jaxrs classpath is indeed ill in eclipse.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Sergey Beryozkinsbery...@progress.com wrote:
I can't also run a JAXRS test in Eclipse which depends on AOP aspects, for
some reasons aspectj is not added to the list of libraries even though it's
in the list of
On Wed August 26 2009 6:14:24 am Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
After updating the source and rebuilding the workspace I can see 'src/test'
being sorted before 'src/main'. I'm wondering, what might've caused it ?
The new maven eclipse plugin did this. It's kind of on purpose to make it
closer
I think some exclude's are needed
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Daniel Kulpdk...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed August 26 2009 6:14:24 am Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
After updating the source and rebuilding the workspace I can see 'src/test'
being sorted before 'src/main'. I'm wondering, what
Great, thanks Sergey. I just tried this, and wasn't able to read/write an
arbitrary object.
I've registered a MessageBodyReader and a MessageBodyWriter (actually, the
same object) like so:
FooXmlReaderWriter fooReaderWriter = new FooXmlReaderWriter();
Hi Josh
Thanks, this is exactly how providers are expected to be registered.
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/CXF-DOSGi
shows my changes have been picked up so it's a bug then. Have you tries the lastest build from snapshots or built the trunk
yourself, including a trunk/distributuon
Bah, my isReadable and isWriteable were wrong. Sorry, false alarm. This
works like a charm!
Thanks,
Josh
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Sergey Beryozkin sbery...@progress.comwrote:
Hi Josh
Thanks, this is exactly how providers are expected to be registered.
Oh, this is exactly the sort of message I was in need for in the end of the
long and difficult day :-)
Cool. If you could verify (later on today or next week when you're back) that
you could do
Dictionary props = new Hashtable();
props.put(org.apache.cxf.rs.provider, new Object[]{new
