[DOSGi] Reworking the system tests

2010-01-22 Thread davidb
Hi all, One of the things to-do for the DOSGi refactoring work that's currently happening on trunk is to re-enable the system tests. Now both Sergey and I have been fighting with the spring-osgi based testing system that's there before and I can tell you it's generally no fun at all. The biggest

Re: [DOSGi] Reworking the system tests

2010-01-22 Thread Eoghan Glynn
David, One thing to note about pax-exam is that its doesn't AFAIK have a feature analogous to the spring-osgi-test support for accessing and adding to the manifest for the on-the-fly bundle. Now I don't know whether we could possibly live without this manifest-mangling as currently done by the

Re: [DOSGi] Reworking the system tests

2010-01-22 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Yep, now that you mention it, tiny bundles were what Toni Menzel of the PAX team suggested using when we tripped over a similar issue with the SMX integration tests during the Karaf switch-over. Cheers, Eoghan 2010/1/22 dav...@apache.org Thanks for the heads up Eoghan. I understood that the

Re: JAXB and JAX-RS under CXF

2010-01-22 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi, please see more comments inline snip/ just one more question. I converted a plain (non-OSGi) JAX-RS project to DOSGi-based CXF. Now, for some of my JAXB annotated classes I get the error message: com.sun.istack.internal.SAXException2: unable to marshal type a.b.c.X as an element because

Re: JAXB and JAX-RS under CXF

2010-01-22 Thread Daniel Bimschas
Damnit. I just changed the Pax-Runner configuration to only use Equinox and now the tests pass, everything seems fine. Are you interested in a tiny Maven-based project demonstrating the issue? Am 22.01.2010 um 16:58 schrieb Sergey Beryozkin: Hi, please see more comments inline snip/

Re: JAXB and JAX-RS under CXF

2010-01-22 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Ok, great it started working for you... Do you reckon that something can actually be fixed at the DOSGI level ? If yes then indeed, please open a DOSGI issue and attach a project. But it looks like it is a container-specific issue ? Which one were you using originally, before switching to

Re: JAXB and JAX-RS under CXF

2010-01-22 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Excellent, thanks. Please ping the Felix team, and I'll play with this project too... cheers, Sergey - Original Message - From: Daniel Bimschas bimsc...@itm.uni-luebeck.de To: dev@cxf.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:43 PM Subject: Re: JAXB and JAX-RS under CXF Sergey,

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.6

2010-01-22 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 - Original Message - From: Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org To: dev@cxf.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:44:41 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.6 This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6 Once again, there have

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.9

2010-01-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
With 11 +1 votes and no other votes, this vote passes. I'll get the artifacts syncing to central and onto the mirrors. Dan On Tue January 19 2010 8:41:00 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have

[RESULT][VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.6

2010-01-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
With 12 +1 votes and no other votes, this vote passes. I'll get it syncing to central and onto the mirrors. Dan On Tue January 19 2010 8:44:41 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done