+1 for we introduce a services module to house these kind of Service
which is based on CXF and can be use out of box :)
It could be helpful for the user to use this kind of Enterprise service
more easily.
On 9/16/11 1:07 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:27:06 PM Col
On Fri Sep 16 09:35:33 2011, Freeman Fang wrote:
On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not
really sure
what to do. :-(
One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac
TimeMachine users that may have
Dan, as an ASF member, are you allowed to send an email asking if we can copy
this down into
svn?
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>
> On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not really sure
>> what t
I'd love to have this in trunk.
+1 on in trunk,
+1 on this being available - it is one of the core questions asked in
enterprise setups.
+1 also for making this very very very modular.
/je
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:22 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
>
> On 2011-9-16, at 上午1:07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not
really sure
what to do. :-(
One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac
TimeMachine users that may have them from a previous build or
something?) I
c
On 2011-9-16, at 上午1:07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:27:06 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
In my opinion, this implementation will greatly enhance CXF's
security
story and will help to drive new users to the product. I would like
to
ask the CXF community for t
Hi
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:27:06 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
In my opinion, this implementation will greatly enhance CXF's security
story and will help to drive new users to the product. I would like to
ask the CXF community for their opinion on this contribution (+1/-1?).
A
2011/9/15 Daniel Kulp :
> On Thursday, September 15, 2011 2:25:55 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
>> 2011/9/15 Freeman Fang :
>> > Not sure we can download and ship the wsdl with CXF kit per license
>> > reason.
>> I was thinking about what to do with WS-RM tests and wanted to ask
>> about the licencing cond
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:27:06 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
> In my opinion, this implementation will greatly enhance CXF's security
> story and will help to drive new users to the product. I would like to
> ask the CXF community for their opinion on this contribution (+1/-1?).
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 2:25:55 PM Aki Yoshida wrote:
> 2011/9/15 Freeman Fang :
> > Not sure we can download and ship the wsdl with CXF kit per license
> > reason.
> I was thinking about what to do with WS-RM tests and wanted to ask
> about the licencing condition for those interoperabiliy
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not really sure
what to do. :-(
One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac
TimeMachine users that may have them from a previous build or something?) I
could throw them up on my personal server for now.
All,
I would like to initiate a discussion on contributing a STS (Security
Token Service) framework implementation to CXF. CXF currently has an
STS framework in the ws-security module, and ships with a simple
implementation in the examples. Talend would like to contribute a more
sophisticated impl
2011/9/15 Freeman Fang :
> Not sure we can download and ship the wsdl with CXF kit per license reason.
>
I was thinking about what to do with WS-RM tests and wanted to ask
about the licencing condition for those interoperabiliy lab's WSDLs.
Another thing I wanted to ask was whether we are allowed
13 matches
Mail list logo
