+1
David
On 12 April 2012 21:26, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
It's been 6 months since the 2.5.0 release and thus it's time for the 2.6
release. We've been VERY busy with many new features, lots of refactoring,
bunch of OSGi enhancements, etc... The migration guide at:
+1
David
On 12 April 2012 21:23, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.5.2 which is a very large amount.
We've back ported over 75 of them to 2.4.7 and 25 to 2.3.10. These patch
releases are certainly overdue.
List of issues:
2.3.10:
+1
Christian
Am 12.04.2012 22:26, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
It's been 6 months since the 2.5.0 release and thus it's time for the 2.6
release. We've been VERY busy with many new features, lots of refactoring,
bunch of OSGi enhancements, etc... The migration guide at:
+1.
Colm.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Christian Schneider
ch...@die-schneider.net wrote:
+1
Christian
Am 12.04.2012 22:26, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
It's been 6 months since the 2.5.0 release and thus it's time for the 2.6
release. We've been VERY busy with many new features, lots of
+1
Alessio
On 04/12/2012 10:26 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
It's been 6 months since the 2.5.0 release and thus it's time for the 2.6
release. We've been VERY busy with many new features, lots of refactoring,
bunch of OSGi enhancements, etc... The migration guide at:
Hi,
I've just been running some tests with Apache CXF 2.5.3 tag and noticed
that I have some failures in the JBossWS integration due to missing
opensaml classes at runtime.
AFAICS, the org.opensaml:opensaml dependency is pulled in through WSS4J
1.6.5 and I initially assumed it would have been
OK, thanks.
On 04/13/2012 02:10 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Alessio,
OpenSAML is also required for adding or validating SAML Assertions in
the security runtime, and so I would say it is a required dependency.
For example, the AbstractBindingBuilder has a direct dependency on an
+1
Glen
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-CXF-2-6-0-tp5636705p5638535.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
On 13/04/12 17:27, jordi wrote:
Hi Sergey,
thanks a lot for your answer, but now I've got a new doubt... :-(
To build the authorization header I use the following piece of code:
WebClient wc = WebClient.create(http://localhost:8080/oauth/initiate;);
+1 - non binding.
On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:55, Glen Mazza glen.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Glen
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-CXF-2-6-0-tp5636705p5638535.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
On Apr 12, 2012, at 14:23, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.5.2 which is a very large amount.
We've back ported over 75 of them to 2.4.7 and 25 to 2.3.10. These patch
releases are certainly overdue.
List of issues:
2.3.10:
+1
Aki
2012/4/12 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.5.2 which is a very large amount.
We've back ported over 75 of them to 2.4.7 and 25 to 2.3.10. These patch
releases are certainly overdue.
List of issues:
2.3.10:
+1
Aki
2012/4/12 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
It's been 6 months since the 2.5.0 release and thus it's time for the 2.6
release. We've been VERY busy with many new features, lots of refactoring,
bunch of OSGi enhancements, etc... The migration guide at:
+1
- Dennis
On 04/13/2012 08:23 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.5.2 which is a very large amount.
We've back ported over 75 of them to 2.4.7 and 25 to 2.3.10. These patch
releases are certainly overdue.
List of issues:
2.3.10:
+1
- Dennis
On 04/13/2012 08:26 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
It's been 6 months since the 2.5.0 release and thus it's time for the 2.6
release. We've been VERY busy with many new features, lots of refactoring,
bunch of OSGi enhancements, etc... The migration guide at:
15 matches
Mail list logo
