+1.
Colm.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Jim Ma mail2ji...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Willem Jiang willem.ji...@gmail.comwrote:
It makes sense.
+1 for it.
On 4/25/12 2:30 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just wanted to open up a discussion about dropping support for
On 24/04/12 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just wanted to open up a discussion about dropping support for 2.3.x.
2.3.0 was release over 18 months ago. Since then, 2.4.x was released over a
year ago and 2.5.x 6 months ago. (and 2.6 last week). Thus, there has
been plenty of opportunity (a whole
+1Eric JohnsonPrinciple Technical Writer | FuseSource Corp.emjohn...@fusesource.com|fusesource.comoffice: (781) 280-4174skype: finnmccumial | twitter: @finnmccumialblog:http://documentingit.blogspot.com/On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:On 24/04/12 19:30, Daniel Kulp wrote:Just
Any chance you can create a simple test case for this? I don't see the full
stack trace for the exception so I'm not really sure where to look.
However, my gut feeling is that you should change:
PersonService serviceClient = (PersonService) factory.create();
Client proxy =