[GitHub] johnament commented on issue #352: Config handling for MP rest client

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
johnament commented on issue #352: Config handling for MP rest client URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/352#issuecomment-349835011 This one is `ProviderFactory.comparePriorityStatus` only considers the annotation, not the registered priority.

[GitHub] johnament commented on issue #352: Config handling for MP rest client

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
johnament commented on issue #352: Config handling for MP rest client URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/352#issuecomment-349829228 I see why it doesn't work. It's related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7543 , basically the JAX-RS client impl is done as a completely

[GitHub] johnament closed pull request #352: Config handling for MP rest client

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
johnament closed pull request #352: Config handling for MP rest client URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/352 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of provenance: As this is a foreign pull request

[GitHub] johnament commented on issue #352: Config handling for MP rest client

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
johnament commented on issue #352: Config handling for MP rest client URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/352#issuecomment-349826263 @andymc12 I think this is fine. weird that the priority isn't coming over. I see in `ConfigurableImpl` we read the priority.

Re: Push does not work

2017-12-06 Thread Andriy Redko
Hi Sergey, Has it been resolved? Have nothing to push but could do just whitespace. Let me know if you want me to try. Best Regards, Andriy Redko SB> Hi SB> Seeing my push being repeatedly rejected SB> remote: This repository is currently out of sync, please SB> remote: contact

[GitHub] andymc12 opened a new pull request #352: Config handling for MP rest client

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
andymc12 opened a new pull request #352: Config handling for MP rest client URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/352 @johnament Can you take a look at these changes? This should help us handle the `Configurable` methods. Notice that the overrides of the priority do not currently

Push does not work

2017-12-06 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Seeing my push being repeatedly rejected remote: This repository is currently out of sync, please remote: contact us...@infra.apache.org! To https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (pre-receive hook declined) with 'git pull' showing all is up to

[GitHub] typekpb commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
typekpb commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#issuecomment-349785868 exactly! This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] typekpb commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
typekpb commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#discussion_r155371289 ## File path:

[GitHub] typekpb commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
typekpb commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#discussion_r155371258 ## File path: tools/wsdlto/test/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/tools/wsdlto/jaxws/CodeGenOptionTest.java

[GitHub] deki commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
deki commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#discussion_r155334050 ## File path:

[GitHub] deki commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
deki commented on a change in pull request #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#discussion_r155332951 ## File path: tools/wsdlto/test/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/tools/wsdlto/jaxws/CodeGenOptionTest.java

[GitHub] typekpb commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
typekpb commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#issuecomment-349726024 Well, is it? Not sure On Dec 6, 2017 18:44, "Dennis Kieselhorst" wrote: > I don't mean

[GitHub] deki commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
deki commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#issuecomment-349718839 I don't mean the annotation. The date ifself is still part of the classes generated by xjc, isn't it?

[GitHub] typekpb commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
typekpb commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#issuecomment-349718295 Exactly. As @Generated annotation spreads across the projects and is not generated implicitly, I just tried to keep the effort

[GitHub] deki commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java

2017-12-06 Thread GitBox
deki commented on issue #324: RFC introduced: Supress generated date switch for wsdl2java URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/324#issuecomment-349716212 Don't worry about the failing build, unfortunately this happens from time to time. If I understand it correctly, the option