Re: Deprecate aegis databinding ?

Hi Jim, I am not aware of any project that uses Aegis data binding. I believe deprecating / removing it would make perfect sense. +1. Thank you! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 5:06 a.m. Jim Ma wrote: > Hi all, > I am not sure if it's the time to deprecate some old cxf

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 3.6.3 and 3.5.8

+1, thanks Freeman! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 3:43 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi, > > It’s been a while since the last releases and many issues have been > addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 3.6.3 and 3.5.8 > > Staging areas: >

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.0.4(2nd attempt)

+1, thanks again Freeman! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Mar 6, 2024, 7:48 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > It’s been a while since the last release and many issues have been > addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.4. > > Staging area: >

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 4.0.4

+1, thanks Freeman! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Mar 5, 2024, 4:58 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > It’s been a while since the last release and many issues have been > addressed, so here is the VOTE for CXF 4.0.4. > > Staging area: >

Re: Plans for release 4.0.4?

Hi Freeman, no objections, thank you! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, 4:33 PM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Team, > > If there are no other objections, I will try to do the release the coming > Tuesday. > > I will follow the document here >

Re: Plans for release 4.0.4?

Thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, 10:18 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Yes, I'll call a vote today on WSS4J 3.0.3. > > Colm. > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:28 PM Freeman Fang > wrote: > > > > +1 to release Apache CXF 4.0.4 > > > > @Colm O hEigeartaigh Any

Re: Request mapping warnings

me instances that have nothing to do with these JAX-WS/RS > endpoints declared in this file. > > > > Is there something I can trace into to see when a service gets registered > as a *ClassResourceInfo *? > > > > Regards, > > > > J.P. Urkens > > *From:*

Re: Request mapping warnings

Hi Jean, Indeed it looks like you have the same resource registered twice hence the warning. It may come from the use of automatic resource scans and manual resource registration. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Jul 19, 2023, 7:39 AM Jean Pierre URKENS < jean-pierre.urk...@devoteam.com>

Re: New releases?

Hi Colm, I am cherry-picking relevant changes regularly (from @dependabot, etc) to all branches but many of them are also related to Jakarta changes and should not be backported. The only large one is HttpClient based conduit that Dan was planning to backport shortly. Thanks! Best Regards,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CXF 4.0.0

Hey Jim, Happy New Year! I think Dan mentioned he was going on vacation for a few weeks. I am not sure he is back, @Colm do you know by any chance? Thank you! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 9:52 PM Jim Ma wrote: > Happy new year, everyone ! > > I see the CXF 4.0.0

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.1

+1, thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Dec 19, 2022, 11:53 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.1. The main features > are dependency updates (e.g. CXF 3.5.5) to pick up CVE fixes: > > Artifacts: >

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

Works for me, thanks a lot Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 8:45 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! @Colm @Dan > do > > we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as well? With > > 4.0.0 out and

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

Hi Jim, I don't think anything blocking is left, +1 to move forward! @Colm @Dan do we want to drop 4.0.0 only or make 3.4.x / 3.5.x releases as well? With 4.0.0 out and 3.6.0 getting ready to be out soon (hopefully), the 3.4.x is approaching EOL quickly, could be the last release. Thank you

Re: WSS4J 3.0.0 update and cxf-rt-ws-security tests

Hi Colm, Thanks a lot for quick fix, I could confirm that builds are rolling again. I suspected the entropy issues but changing JDK secure random source did not help in this case. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, 7:06 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi Andriy, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

> merge the this PR https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/999 to the main > branch. > > Thanks, > Jim > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:06 PM Andrey Redko wrote: > >> This is great, thanks Jim, I will also take a look shortly. Thanks! >> >> Best Regards, >>

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

This is great, thanks Jim, I will also take a look shortly. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Sep 21, 2022, 1:02 AM Jim Ma wrote: > Hi All, > I tried to remove the osgi and karaf from CXF with this draft PR : > https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/999 >

Re: Jenkins job CXF/pipeline/3.4.x-fixes#675 failed

Hey Colm, The build has failed because of test failures, you could see that on [Test results] tab. Since this is a pipeline with JDK matrix (3 builds in parallel), the output is a bit tricky to interpret sometimes. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jun 13, 2022, 8:29 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh

Re: Jakarta build hangs on test

Thanks a lot, Jim! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, May 12, 2022, 3:53 AM Jim Ma wrote: > It looks this hang issue is fixed : > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/CXF-8371/41/#showFailuresLink > > Regards, > Jim > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.5.2 and 3.4.7

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Apr 8, 2022, 2:21 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. This > contains a bunch of fixes related to jax-rs TCK’s as well as a bunch of > dependency updates and other fixes. > > > Staging

Re: Releases soon?

+1, I will wrap up the open tickets (I think it is only one) today, thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 9:19 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 to release soon > > Thanks! > Freeman > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:59 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We've

Re: Change default branch to main

No objections, thanks Colm. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Feb 1, 2022, 7:59 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi, > > Most other Apache projects I work on (Camel, ActiveMQ, Karaf, etc.) > have switched to use main as the default branch, to align with what > the default branch is for new

Re: Release 3.5.0 next week?

Definitely +1, moreover it seems like Spring Framework 6.0.0 snapshots are already available. Thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 11:42 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Question for everyone: > > Would it make sense to release 3.5.0 next week?Things seem fairly >

Re: Is there any change recently on cxf website(from http---> to https)

Hey guys, Here we are [1], the redirection change took place on December 1st, which coincide with the time the schema issues started to surface. I think he change is irreversible, what are our options? Could we configure parsers to work with redirect? Update schemas to use https instead? What do

Re: Jakarta XML binding

Agree with Dan, our initial plan was to keep 3.5.x on javax.* and provide full jakarta.* support in 4.x. Afaik, we have very limited support for Jakarta namespaces, handler chains, etc but that is it. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, 2:37 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Not 3.5

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.5 and 3.3.12

+1, thanks a lot Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Sep 29, 2021, 4:59 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.5 and 3.3.12. We have fixed over 34 > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last releases. > > > Staging repositories: >

Re: Releases next week?

Hey Dan, For 3.5.0 we are still waiting for xmlschema and neethi releases (both have SNAPSHOT versions right now), so it make take longer to clear the path out. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 3:08 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > I guess the question is: Which releases?

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.4 and 3.3.11

+1, thanks a lot Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:41 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.4 and 3.3.11. We have fixed over 26 > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last releases. > > > Staging repositories: >

Re: Releases soon?

Hey Dan, I am in the process of backporting one ticket, it is in master already and about to be integrated into 3.4.x / 3.3.x should be done within next 2-3 hours. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jun 3, 2021, 10:57 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > It looks like all the issues marked for

Re: Doubts on ContextResolvers (relates to CXF-8516)

Hey David, Thanks a lot for debugging it, I have few pointers why we have such ordering of the message body readers / writers, will continue looking into it over the weekend. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 11:24 PM David Blevins wrote: > I think what I'll do on

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.3 and 3.3.10

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 4:59 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.3 and 3.3.10. We have fixed over 20 > issues and it’s been almost 3 months since the last releases. > > > Staging repositories: >

Re: release 3.3.10 soon ?

I should be able to look at it over the weekend. The implementation choices to try are limited, if no surprises - should be not too difficult. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 2:08 AM David Karlsen wrote: > How about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8424 - will it

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.5.1

+1, thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 12:38 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.5.1. This is a minor bug fix > release, which also picks up more recent CXF, Spring, Tomcat, Jetty > (amongst others) dependencies. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.1 and 3.3.8

+1, thanks a lot Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Nov 3, 2020, 4:30 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.3.8 and 3.4.1. We’ve fixed over 20 JIRA > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last set of releases. > > Staging repos: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.0

Certainly +1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Aug 20, 2020, 2:28 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.4.0. There are several new > features, many dependency updates, bunches of fixes, etc…. See the > migration guide at: >

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

Hi Dennis, Thanks for checking! Yeah, I run into the same afterthought, I will rename the job to CXF-JDK8 (dropping Trunk and Master parts), the same for other, sounds good? Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Jul 22, 2020, 12:46 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > Hi Andriy! > > Thanks

Re: Release CXF 3.4.0

Hi Dennis, Haven't check your branch yet but if there is no changes (or changes are compatible with 2.2.x) besides dependencies we should be good to go with 2.3.x. The CXF 3.5.0 would use 2.4.x release line in this case (due in October). Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Jul 22,

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.7 and 3.2.14

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 5:02 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.3.7 and 3.2.14. We’ve fixed over 20 JIRA > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last set of releases. > > Staging repos: >

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.5.0

+1 Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, 6:14 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.5.0. This is a major new > release with the following issues fixed: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313420=12336848 >

Re: Releases soon?

Certainly +1 from me. Thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jun 11, 2020, 7:12 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > We should get 3.3.7 and 3.2.14 out soon. Is there anything else to go into > these releases? I propose that this should be the last 3.2.x release, as > 3.4.0 should be

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.6 and 3.2.13

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 2:38 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.3.6 and 3.2.13. We’ve fixed over 30 JIRA > issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last set of releases. > > Staging repos: >

Re: 3.4.0

-api/swagger-core/pull/3445 Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 9:24 AM David Karlsen wrote: > Thanks. What PR do you have in mind for validation /swagger? > > ons. 19. feb. 2020, 15:13 skrev Andrey Redko : > >> Hey David, >> >> Dan/Colm

Re: 3.4.0

Hey David, Dan/Colm very likely have more insights, from my perspective we have one unresolved issue with Bean Validation 2.0 (Swagger is a blocker but we can't get guys to look at our PRs). And would be great to pass TCK (we have 77 tests failing, work is in progress but takes time). For sure,

Re: Problems with SSE processing

Hey Carlos, Yes, we've seen the issue reported, haven't time to look into it yet, but will update the ticket with the findings shortly. Thank you. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 3:38 AM Carlos Sierra Andrés wrote: > Hi all, > > it looks like a user has found an error in

Re: Jakarta EE TCKs and compatibility logo

Hi Dennis, Yeah, I think we can do that, the TCK build looks pretty reliable but yeah, we may mark it unstable if only tests fail, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sun, Jan 19, 2020, 5:30 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > Hi Andriy! > > Done, >

Re: Votes by end of week?

Hey Andy, I would finish up with SSE today, I was reading through the callback discussion threads you mentioned, we may need to change a few things before merge. The TCK formparam fixes look good to me, but I haven't dug into the cause to be honest, Colm if you could take a look would be awesome,

Re: Re: JAX-RS Whiteboard and URI builder

Hey Colm, Unfortunately I didn't succeed yet, prioritizing issues over TCK runs, will try to resume work shortly. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Dec 20, 2019, 7:56 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > The git commit referenced the wrong JIRA - it should have been >

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: CXF-8155: Update to Jackson 2.10.1

Hey Colm, Sorry my bad, I will address it right away, thanks for checking that. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Nov 13, 2019, 4:24 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > This merge is causing the JAX-RS OSGi tests to fail: > > https://builds.apache.org/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK18/4622/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Oct 24, 2019, 11:34 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s > also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. > > It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.3.4

+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 3:19 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed 20 JIRAS. > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1145/ < >

Re: 3.3.4 release on Monday

Hey Freeman, I have created ticket for it yesterday, targeting 3.4.0 for now, there are changes related to Jakarta EE artifacts, I listed that in JIRA as well. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 12:58 PM 方越 wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I see spring boot 2.2.0 is just out,

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 1:10 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is vote to release CXF 3.2.10 and CXF 3.3.3. 3.3.3 also required > the release of cxf-build-utils 3.4.3 to pickup the new Checkstyle and PMD > configs required by the new maven plugins.

Re: Releases

Hi Colm, Nothing pending on my side, all green for release train. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 10:03 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any other issues that should be fixed for CXF 3.3.3 / 3.2.10, or > are we good to go for the releases? > > Colm. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.9, CXF 3.3.2, and cxf-build-utils 3.4.2

+1, Andriy Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, May 10, 2019, 11:36 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is vote to release CXF 3.2.9 and CXF 3.3.2. 3.3.2 also required the > release of cxf-build-utils 3.4.2 to pickup the new PMD config required by > the new PMD maven plugin. This fixes over 30

Re: OpenAPIDefinition does not seem to work

Hi Aishwarya, You can use OpenApiCustomizer (the OpenApiFeature has a property for it) which should substitute the base path with the contextual one. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, May 9, 2019, 8:57 AM aishwarya.s1...@gmail.com < aishwarya.s1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.1

+1 Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 2:56 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is vote to release 3.3.1. This doesn’t fix a ton of issues (only > 12), but it does fix two relatively important regressions. > > Staging area: >

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.0 and CXF XJC Utils 3.3.0

+1, this is a big one, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 4:33 PM Daniel Kulp This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.3.0 and the XJC Utils 3.3.0 it > needs. The main new feature is support for Java 11, but there are a bunch > of other updates and enhancements such as

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.8

+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 4:36 PM Daniel Kulp It’s been 3 months since 3.2.7 so we should do another release. We’ve > fixed 18 JIRA issues > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1134 < >

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

+1 as well, long due. I am working on examples for Java 11 and JPMS, but it is not blocking anyhow the vote / release. Thanks guys. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 8:53 PM Freeman Fang +1, we should be ready to go. > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > > >

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

Hi Dennis, I will take a look tonight if no one does it before me. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 10:51 AM Dennis Kieselhorst > > > >> Let's focus on JAX-WS and JAX-RS (along with JAXB) for 3.3.0 as those > >> are the main implementations that we are offering.

Re: systests/jax-rs JAXRSRxJava2FlowableTest

Hey Colm, I haven't seen them failing on Jenkins, strangely, but I will take a look tonight for sure, thanks a lot for noticing that! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, 12:25 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh Hi Andriy, > > I noticed the JAXRSRxJava2FlowableTest is not working properly

Re: cxf-services-ws-discovery-api

Hey guys, Passes on Mac as well, may be we could implement more reliable mechanism to detect if multicast is supported or nor. I will try to research this part. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sun, Dec 23, 2018, 2:55 PM Dennis Kieselhorst Hi Colm! > > Is this test failing for anyone else?

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

Hey guys, I also noticed that some of our integrations, like fe Swagger / OpenApi do explicitly depend on JAXB APIs artifacts. I think we should be careful here and at least add exclusions, avoiding classpath collisions. There could be more examples like that. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy

Re: Remove HTrace tracing?

Hey Colm, Yeah, this is sad, I will remove it, thanks for heads up. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Nov 26, 2018, 7:32 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh Hi all, > > Apache HTrace has been retired ( > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/htrace.html). Any objections to > removing the Htrace tracing

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.7 and xic-utils 3.2.3

+1, thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Oct 24, 2018, 3:35 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > It’s been over two months since we last release a 3.2.x. Thus, it’s > time. We’ve fixed a bunch of bugs, fixed some performance regressions, > added a few new features, etc… > > Tags: > CXF: >

Re: CXF-7753

Hey David, I started to look at it but haven't completed yet, will try to go over it in the next few days (sadly I haven't worked with HTTP signatures so my review might not be very helpful). Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 11:14 AM David Karlsen wrote: > One of

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.4.5

+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 5:25 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.4.5. > > Git tag: https://github.com/apache/cxf-fediz/tree/fediz-1.4.5 > > Issues fixed: > >

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF 3.1.17

+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 8:46 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > +1 > > Thanks! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > > On Sep 30, 2018, at 8:33 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > wrote: > > > > This is a vote to

Re:

Hey Irfan, Freeman committed the fix on the master and 3.2.x, could you please give it a try? (with 3.2.7-SNAPSHOT). Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Sep 27, 2018, 11:12 AM Irfan Pasha wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > Any thoughts on this issue ? > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:58 AM Irfan

Re: Fixing JDK10 (and probably JDK9) builds for master

gt; Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > On Sep 22, 2018, at 6:58 AM, Andrey Redko wrote: > > Hi Freeman, > > Absolutely, it should be released next week, I will configure the job. For > 3.7-SNAPSHOT, we need to find the way to fetch it, it's no

Re: Fixing JDK10 (and probably JDK9) builds for master

Hi Freeman, Absolutely, it should be released next week, I will configure the job. For 3.7-SNAPSHOT, we need to find the way to fetch it, it's not available in repos accessible to Jenkins. Have we solved such a problem before? PS: JDK9 is rolling as well. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko

***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Adding resourcePackages in OpenAPICustomizer

gt; Sure Andrey, will do. > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:17 AM Andrey Redko wrote: > > > >> Hey Irfan, > >> > >> Looks like you are doing everything right, would you mind please to open > >> an issue and attach the sample project to it (so we c

Re: Adding resourcePackages in OpenAPICustomizer

Hey Irfan, Looks like you are doing everything right, would you mind please to open an issue and attach the sample project to it (so we can reproduce)? Thank you. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 7:36 AM Irfan Pasha wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > All my JAX-RS annotations and

Re: Questions on CXF OpenAPI

t see any option to upload. I only see a > text area instead of uploading option. Is that the way it should be ? > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:12 AM Andrey Redko wrote: > >> Hey Irfan, >> >> So yeah, you cannot use attachments like this, it should be hidden behind >

Re: Questions on CXF OpenAPI

Hey Irfan, So yeah, you cannot use attachments like this, it should be hidden behind binary payload. The only thing you need to do is to change type="file" to type="string" in your @Schema. This is the OAS 3.0 approach: https://swagger.io/docs/specification/describing-request-body/file-upload/

Re: Unstable tracing systests...

Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 3:46 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > On Aug 29, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Andrey Redko wrote: > > > > Hey Dan, > > > > We could try to add a shirt delay (to let spans flush) or trigger flush > > forceably (if it is

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: update some dependencies

Thanks Dennis, I will try to take a look on OpenApi ones, getting 3.2.x build back on track now. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 11:41 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > Ops, sorry had multiple other unrelated test failures that's why I haven't > recognized it. Will

Re: What about adding WebClient#patch ?

It is good question actually, the JAXRS 2.1 API (SyncInvoker) does not have patch() either, I think we could add one to WebClient, won't harm. Not sure about USE_ASYNC though, we may have to keep it for backward compatiblity, no? Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Aug 13, 2018, 10:08 AM

Re: Failing tracing systests on master

Hey Colm, Yes, I will take a look tonight, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 7:01 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi all, > > Following some of the recent upgrades the tracing systests are failing on > master for me: > > [ERROR] Failures: > [ERROR] > >

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

I will take a look, may be we could submit the PR for it. ServiceMix guys are very responsive. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 9:54 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > On 2018/07/27 11:28:33, Andriy Redko wrote: > > 2.2.11 > > > > Let us try to upgrade to 2.3.0? :-) > > Looks

Re: Change master to 3.3?

Thanks Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 7:45 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > Master is now 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT…..Feel free to start pushing anything > there. > > I’ve setup the 3.2.x-fixes branch. I still need to get Jenkins builds > setup for it. > > Dan > > > On Jun 26,

Re: Change master to 3.3?

Hi Andy, I think we certainly should be thinking towards jdk11 but start with jdk10 and win some time. We know what is coming, JAXB and SOAP are our main pain points, we could import these dependencies directly from get-go and be quite ready for jdk11. Thoughts? Best Regards, Andriy Redko

Re: Change master to 3.3?

Big +1, same question as Colm has, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 9:48 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1. Would master stay on Java 8 or move up to Java 10? > > Colm. > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > I’m thinking of creating the

Re: Release cxf-xjc-plugin so that it works with Java 10?

Hi Freeman, Thanks a lot for sharing the post, will go through it shortly. Hope to have something out this week so we could discuss it. Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:03 AM Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Andriy, > > Thanks for your work. > >

Re: Builds on Jenkins

Thanks a lot, John. On it. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Sat, May 5, 2018, 10:02 AM John D. Ament wrote: > Andriy, > > You now have access to configure the jobs. > > I've reconfigured the JDK18 job to show timestamps. I also changed the > time out strategy from

Re: A few 'Feature' questions

Yeah, certainly, would be good to get a bit more details or small code snippets to understand the problem. Mark, is it possible? Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 12:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys > > Think CXF should support that

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.3.4

+1, thank you Dan for quick resolution Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 5:18 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release CXF 3.2.4. We only fixed a few issues since > 3.2.3, but it fixes a severe regression for Syncope as well as fixes a >

Re: SSE support and regular endpoints

Hi Carlos, That's right, SSE in CXF requires dedicated transport, however it is fully compatible with the existing HTTP transport (regular endpoints). Both SSE and non-SSE endpoints should work just fine. Here is a link to the wiki,

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF 3.1.15

+1 Andriy On Mar 8, 2018 9:20 AM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.1.15. > > Issued fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CXF/versions/ > 12342151 > > Artifacts: >

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.2

+1! Andriy On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is a vote to release CXF 3.2.2. We’ve fixed over 60 JIRA issues, > definitely time to release it. This also includes releases of build-utils > (3.4.0) and xjc-utils (3.2.1) to allow it to build on Java 9

Re: Remove obsolete RxJava code and keep RxJava2 only one

Hey Sergey, I think the "ideal" in this case depends on whom to ask. For us - yet another module to support, for users - out of the box integration. With new module we could collect a bit more insights if people use it or not. No use - drop in next releases. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.1.10

+1 Andriy On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote for Apache CXF 3.1.10. We’ve fixed a bunch of issues and > I’d like to get it out so we can start trying to concentrate on getting 3.2 > out. > > Staging area: >

Re: CXF 3.2 support jetty9 only (drop jetty8 support)

+1 to this idea, haven't seen Jetty 8 in while in many projects, Jetty 9 would be a way to go I think Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: > Hi Team, > > We have several issues(like CXF-7160 and CXF-7179)

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

Right, it looks like really light version of tracing, which essentially allows to figure out which service/host is the problem. I am not sure how useful it could be in practice, and there is a large overlap with logging in this case. On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

and get a working > service. The CXF tracing could then simply inject the Brave service instead > of taking care of the Brave setup directly. > > Christian > > > 2016-12-07 15:50 GMT+01:00 Andrey Redko <drr...@gmail.com>: > > > I think it is very good idea to integr

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

I think it is very good idea to integrate brave-cxf into CXF. Christian, do you have enough time to work on that? I think I could help you out with that, I have reviewed brave-cxf PRs awhile back. Thanks. On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > I

Re: cxf git commit: [CXF-7164] Support tracing using Zipkin Brave

That's right, the JAX-RS part should be supported by Brave already thanks to dedicated CXF integration (I was involved in late-stage discussions for the PR in question but not in the implementation). Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Christian Schneider <

Re: is a release early december possible?

Hey Romain, Although I cannot comment on release, sorry, I have made a few changes regarding CDI integration (DefaultApplication discovery, release of the creational contexts, handling resource classes properly). The last changes have been committed early last week. Could you please confirm no

Re: cxi integration: multiple buses during deployment?

.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhc

Re: cxi integration: multiple buses during deployment?

ded a single app so I am not in > "multiple" deployments case. > > > Best Regards, > > Andriy Redko > > > > JDA> So still something isn't clicking as I don't have Romain's issue. > Is it > > JDA> specific to when you have multiple deployments in your

Re: cxi integration: multiple buses during deployment?

> > 2016-10-18 13:47 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin <sberyoz...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Andriy > > yes, option 1 is probably the simplest for the CDI integration path, > > > > Thanks, Sergey > > > > On 18/10/16 12:43, Andrey Redko wrote: > > > >&g

  1   2   >