We have +1 votes from:
dkulp, bharath, bmagulies, eglynn, seanoc, davidb, willem, ffang, cschneider,
ubhole
and no other votes. That's 10 +1 votes. Thus, this vote passes. I'll
get the artifacts released to central.
Dan
On Thu February 5 2009 3:27:16 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
(The
+1
Freeman
Daniel Kulp wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
Once again,
+1
On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:24 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
+1
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote
on the
new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided
to
+1
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the
new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go
ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a
+1
David Bosschaert
+1
Daniel Kulp schrieb:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
Once again, there
+1
-- Ulhas
Daniel Kulp wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
Once again,
+1
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the
new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go
ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This
