Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-29 Thread Ulhas Bhole
I think I also casted my +1 but don't see in the list. -- Ulhas Daniel Kulp wrote: We have +1 votes from: dkulp, bganesh, sberyozkin, willemjiang, davidb, seanoc, eglynn, ffang, schneider. and no other votes.Thus, this vote passes. I'll start getting the stuff synced to central and

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
For the record: +1 On Fri May 22 2009 1:50:39 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch releases. HOWEVER, there is a one major new feature: the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
We have +1 votes from: dkulp, bganesh, sberyozkin, willemjiang, davidb, seanoc, eglynn, ffang, schneider. and no other votes.Thus, this vote passes. I'll start getting the stuff synced to central and the dist dir. Dan On Fri May 22 2009 1:50:39 pm Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-28 Thread Jeff Genender
I thought I sent one out too... add me to the belated list ;-) Jeff On May 28, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We have +1 votes from: dkulp, bganesh, sberyozkin, willemjiang, davidb, seanoc, eglynn, ffang, schneider. and no other votes.Thus, this vote passes. I'll start

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-28 Thread Jeff Genender
Make that a +1 too ;-) Jeff On May 28, 2009, at 6:15 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: I thought I sent one out too... add me to the belated list ;-) Jeff On May 28, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We have +1 votes from: dkulp, bganesh, sberyozkin, willemjiang, davidb, seanoc, eglynn,

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-25 Thread Sean O'Callaghan
+1 -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: 22 May 2009 18:51 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2 This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-25 Thread Eoghan Glynn
+1 /Eoghan 2009/5/22 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org: This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch releases.   HOWEVER, there is a one major new feature:   the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes.   Thus, it's

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-25 Thread Ulhas Bhole
+1, -- Ulhas Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch releases. HOWEVER, there is a one major new feature: the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes. Thus, it's worth a release.

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-25 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Daniel Kulp schrieb: This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch releases. HOWEVER, there is a one major new feature: the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes. Thus, it's worth a release. :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-24 Thread davidb
+1 David 2009/5/22 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org: This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch releases.   HOWEVER, there is a one major new feature:   the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes.   Thus, it's

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-23 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 Willem Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch releases. HOWEVER, there is a one major new feature: the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes. Thus, it's worth a release.

[VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.2

2009-05-22 Thread Daniel Kulp
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.2 With only 23 JIRA's resolved for 2.2.2, this doesn't have as many fixes as many of the previous patch releases. HOWEVER, there is a one major new feature: the JAX-RS 1.0 TCK now passes. Thus, it's worth a release. :-) List of issues: