On Mon July 6 2009 3:02:00 am Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a bug of CXF, if the user define the extension in the
> service and binding,
> we should use the service's value.
Agreed. Good catch.
Dan
>
> Willem
>
> liucong wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In the
> > SOAP/JMS(http://w
Hi,
I think this is a bug of CXF, if the user define the extension in the
service and binding,
we should use the service's value.
Willem
liucong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the
> SOAP/JMS(http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20081121/#wsdl-11-properties).
> If a property is specified at multiple l
Hi all,
In the
SOAP/JMS(http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20081121/#wsdl-11-properties).
If a property is specified at multiple levels, the most specific setting
will take precedence (port first, then service, then binding).
But I invetigate the code of CXF. I find someting int
org.apache.cxf.
