@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
JSON via JAXB definitely leaves something to be desired.
Do you reckon it's the limitations of the underlying JSON library that we
use (Jettison) or do you refer to the insufficient number of hooks for our
JSON JAXRS reader/writer whiich
-
From: Tong, Gary (IDEAS) gary.t...@morganstanley.com
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:53 AM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
Hi Sergey,
If you give me until next week I should be able to package something together
and send it to you.
Alternatively, this would be a great project
Would you want to give this to someone from GSoC? This could actually be a
pretty sweet project.
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 12:14
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
If you give me until next week
actually utilized...
If yes - then I'm not sure it would qualify ? Would you define the scope
differently ?
cheers, Sergey
- Original Message -
From: Tong, Gary (IDEAS) gary.t...@morganstanley.com
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
Would
Hi Gary
I ended up writing my own converter for JSON that uses its own annotations
seperate from JAXB. It's a pretty quick implementation, and only does what
I need it to do. It depends on the JSON objects from json.org, which are
also included in Jettison under a different package. The
?
Cheers,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 18 February 2009 15:15
To: Sergey Beryozkin; dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
2) Are you guys interested in replacing the existing JSON provider,
or making an alternative one
Hi Gary
2) Are you guys interested in replacing the existing JSON provider, or making an alternative one available that allows a bit more
control over how the JSON is rendered?
I'd happy to consider replacing the existing one with a better quality one if it were JAXB driven as a number of
: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
I think it's a limitation of the underlying JSON library. Something like:
@XmlRootElement
public class Foo {
@XmlElementWrapper(name=values)
@XmlElement(name=value)
private ListString values
}
Gives XML like:
foo
values
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 10 February 2009 10:48
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
JSON via JAXB definitely leaves something to be desired.
Do you reckon it's the limitations of the underlying JSON library that we
- Original Message -
From: Tong, Gary (FID) gary.t...@morganstanley.com
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
I think it's a limitation of the underlying JSON library. Something like:
@XmlRootElement
public class Foo {
@XmlElementWrapper
available that allows a bit more control over how the JSON
is rendered?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 10 February 2009 13:23
To: Sergey Beryozkin; dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
I think going
bring in.
Thanks, Sergey
- Original Message -
From: Tong, Gary (FID) gary.t...@morganstanley.com
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the quick responses.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about. Let's say I
12 matches
Mail list logo