RE: JSON in CXF

@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: JSON in CXF Hi Gary JSON via JAXB definitely leaves something to be desired. Do you reckon it's the limitations of the underlying JSON library that we use (Jettison) or do you refer to the insufficient number of hooks for our JSON JAXRS reader/writer whiich

Re: JSON in CXF

- From: Tong, Gary (IDEAS) gary.t...@morganstanley.com To: dev@cxf.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:53 AM Subject: RE: JSON in CXF Hi Sergey, If you give me until next week I should be able to package something together and send it to you. Alternatively, this would be a great project

RE: JSON in CXF

Would you want to give this to someone from GSoC? This could actually be a pretty sweet project. -Original Message- From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com] Sent: 07 April 2009 12:14 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: JSON in CXF Hi Gary If you give me until next week

Re: JSON in CXF

actually utilized... If yes - then I'm not sure it would qualify ? Would you define the scope differently ? cheers, Sergey - Original Message - From: Tong, Gary (IDEAS) gary.t...@morganstanley.com To: dev@cxf.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:21 PM Subject: RE: JSON in CXF Would

Re: JSON in CXF

Hi Gary I ended up writing my own converter for JSON that uses its own annotations seperate from JAXB. It's a pretty quick implementation, and only does what I need it to do. It depends on the JSON objects from json.org, which are also included in Jettison under a different package. The

Re: JSON in CXF

? Cheers, Gary -Original Message- From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com] Sent: 18 February 2009 15:15 To: Sergey Beryozkin; dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: JSON in CXF Hi Gary 2) Are you guys interested in replacing the existing JSON provider, or making an alternative one

Re: JSON in CXF

Hi Gary 2) Are you guys interested in replacing the existing JSON provider, or making an alternative one available that allows a bit more control over how the JSON is rendered? I'd happy to consider replacing the existing one with a better quality one if it were JAXB driven as a number of

Re: JSON in CXF

: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:24 AM Subject: RE: JSON in CXF I think it's a limitation of the underlying JSON library. Something like: @XmlRootElement public class Foo { @XmlElementWrapper(name=values) @XmlElement(name=value) private ListString values } Gives XML like: foo values

RE: JSON in CXF

-Original Message- From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com] Sent: 10 February 2009 10:48 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: JSON in CXF Hi Gary JSON via JAXB definitely leaves something to be desired. Do you reckon it's the limitations of the underlying JSON library that we

Re: JSON in CXF

- Original Message - From: Tong, Gary (FID) gary.t...@morganstanley.com To: dev@cxf.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:24 AM Subject: RE: JSON in CXF I think it's a limitation of the underlying JSON library. Something like: @XmlRootElement public class Foo { @XmlElementWrapper

RE: JSON in CXF

available that allows a bit more control over how the JSON is rendered? Thanks, Gary -Original Message- From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com] Sent: 10 February 2009 13:23 To: Sergey Beryozkin; dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: JSON in CXF I think going

Re: JSON in CXF

bring in. Thanks, Sergey - Original Message - From: Tong, Gary (FID) gary.t...@morganstanley.com To: dev@cxf.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:08 PM Subject: RE: JSON in CXF Hi Guys, Thanks for the quick responses. Here's an example of what I'm talking about. Let's say I