Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-11-26 Thread Glen Mazza
BTW, is UsernameToken Profile implemented yet via WS-SecurityPolicy or just the X.509 TP? Thanks, Glen dkulp wrote: > >> I would >> next like to test out the WS-SecurityPolicy configuration that Dan has >> done. Is it supported only on the CXF 2.2 branch or both 2.1.x and >> 2.2? > > Just

Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-11-03 Thread Glen Mazza
Thanks, that was it--needed to add that and the cxf-rt-ws-security dependency as well. Now different error messages but I'm fighting through them. Glen dkulp wrote: > > > Glen, > > Is this maven based?Have you added a dependency on the > cxf-rt-ws-policy > artifact? > > Dan > > > On

Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-11-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
Glen, Is this maven based?Have you added a dependency on the cxf-rt-ws-policy artifact? Dan On Monday 03 November 2008 7:01:47 am Glen Mazza wrote: > dkulp wrote: > > Actually, the CLIENT side stuff is MUCH better tested right now. I've > > been using the live MS WCF tests at: > > http:

Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-11-03 Thread Glen Mazza
dkulp wrote: > > Actually, the CLIENT side stuff is MUCH better tested right now. I've > been using the live MS WCF tests at: > http://mssoapinterop.org/ilab/ > as my testcases. For the most part, I just run wsdl2java on the wsdls > and have a simple client that calls on them. For each

Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-10-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
Glen, See: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs103/webserv_intro/interop.html Particularly the section entitled: WS-SecurityPolicy Interoperability Guidelines "As a result, Microsoft .NET 3.0 encrypts the UsernameToken in the policy assertion. If you use the policy assertion without encrypting th

Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-10-13 Thread Glen Mazza
dkulp wrote: > >> I would >> next like to test out the WS-SecurityPolicy configuration that Dan has >> done. Is it supported only on the CXF 2.2 branch or both 2.1.x and >> 2.2? > > Just 2.2. It's very "unstable" right now as I kind of move things > around to get it working. Right now,

Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-10-06 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Sunday 05 October 2008, Glen Mazza wrote: > Hello, having just watched my Buffalo Bills get clobbered, The AFC east is definitely proving to be quite interesting this year. The predicted top two teams now have major injury issues, Favre is resurecting the Jets, and Dolphins are surprisingl

WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?

2008-10-05 Thread Glen Mazza
Hello, having just watched my Buffalo Bills get clobbered, I would next like to test out the WS-SecurityPolicy configuration that Dan has done. Is it supported only on the CXF 2.2 branch or both 2.1.x and 2.2? Also, is there any client-side WSDL configuration or is it just service-side WSDL conf