[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1013: [CXF-8724]:Add codegen module back

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
reta commented on code in PR #1013: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1013#discussion_r998123614 ## systests/wsdl_maven/codegen/src/it/cxf-4004/pom.xml: ## @@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ cxf-xjc-ts ${cxf.xjc-utils.version}

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #1013: [CXF-8724]:Add codegen module back

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
reta commented on code in PR #1013: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1013#discussion_r998138208 ## systests/wsdl_maven/codegen/src/it/cxf-4004/pom.xml: ## @@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ cxf-xjc-ts ${cxf.xjc-utils.version}

[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1013: [CXF-8724]:Add codegen module back

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
jimma commented on code in PR #1013: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1013#discussion_r998127232 ## systests/wsdl_maven/codegen/src/it/cxf-4004/pom.xml: ## @@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ cxf-xjc-ts ${cxf.xjc-utils.version}

[GitHub] [cxf] jimma commented on a diff in pull request #1013: [CXF-8724]:Add codegen module back

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
jimma commented on code in PR #1013: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1013#discussion_r998142368 ## systests/wsdl_maven/codegen/src/it/cxf-4004/pom.xml: ## @@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ cxf-xjc-ts ${cxf.xjc-utils.version}

[DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?

2022-10-18 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi all, What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago - https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly. Colm.

[GitHub] [cxf-dosgi] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #10: Bump jackson-databind from 2.10.1 to 2.13.4.1 in /distribution/multi-bundle

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #10: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/pull/10 Bumps [jackson-databind](https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson) from 2.10.1 to 2.13.4.1. Commits See full diff in https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/commits;>compare view

[GitHub] [cxf-dosgi] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #8: Bump jackson-databind from 2.10.1 to 2.12.6.1 in /distribution/multi-bundle

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/pull/8#issuecomment-1282813249 Superseded by #10. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [cxf-dosgi] dependabot[bot] closed pull request #8: Bump jackson-databind from 2.10.1 to 2.12.6.1 in /distribution/multi-bundle

2022-10-18 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #8: Bump jackson-databind from 2.10.1 to 2.12.6.1 in /distribution/multi-bundle URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/pull/8 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?

2022-10-18 Thread Andriy Redko
Hi Colm, I have never seen it used in the wild (at least, the projects I was/am involved with), I think it would make sense to retire it, especially taking into account the OSGi vague plans to support Jakarta. +1 from my side to move it to the attic. Thank you. Best Regards, Andriy Redko

Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?

2022-10-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Colm Yes, I think it makes sense. I don't think CXF DOSGi is heavily used. Regards JB On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:49 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > Hi all, > > What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very > little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years