RE: ProviderFactory singleton?

2009-03-10 Thread Tong, Gary (IDEAS)
Proof of Concept Implementation: ProviderFactory: public static ProviderFactory getInstance() { return getInstance(/); } public static ProviderFactory getInstance(String baseAddress) { Bus bus = BusFactory.getThreadDefaultBus(); ProviderFactoryMap

Re: ProviderFactory singleton?

2009-03-10 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Gary Thanks for posting the code. I thought of going with a slightly different route, after a brief chat with Dan yesterday. The idea is to associate a ProviderFactory instance with a given endpoint (info). Such instance could be then retrieved from a given message whenever needed and it

Re: Nexus, Hudson, and CXF snapshots deploys....

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
I don't hear any objection so I'm going to enable this.Nightly snapshots it is. :-) Dan On Fri March 6 2009 11:13:43 am Daniel Kulp wrote: They've recently setup the hudson instances to allow them to deploy snapshots to the Nexus instance using a special snapshot account. Thus, we

Re: Schema validation via Woodstox ... not for 2.2 :-)

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue March 10 2009 3:28:45 pm Benson Margulies wrote: Given the msv problems I've run into, the woodstox validation code doesn't belong in 2.2. My plan is: 1) commit current state, which is structurally relevant. 2) branch to sandbox. 3) delete the wstx-msv-validator module from the

Re: Schema validation via Woodstox ... not for 2.2 :-)

2009-03-10 Thread Benson Margulies
I thought of a way to avoid branching and deleting, I've arranged for the bus extension not to register. And KK just made me a 'committer' on msv. And said that the 'nuclear' clause was a complete mistake. On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote: On Tue March 10

Re: Schema validation via Woodstox ... not for 2.2 :-)

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue March 10 2009 9:33:14 pm Benson Margulies wrote: I thought of a way to avoid branching and deleting, I've arranged for the bus extension not to register. And KK just made me a 'committer' on msv. That's really cool. And said that the 'nuclear' clause was a complete mistake. Nice.