+1 to move it to the attic.
Thanks!
Freeman
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 4:49 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
>
+1. It makes sense to retire it.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 4:49 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
> https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main).
We definitely don't use it in TomEE. As noted already there are definitely no
plans in Jakarta to adopt OSGi -- even support for modules isn't required or in
any current plans.
-David
> On Oct 19, 2022, at 5:49 AM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
>
> I agree, especially considering the Jakarta
I agree, especially considering the Jakarta aspect.
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:29 AM Andriy Redko wrote:
> Hi Colm,
>
> I have never seen it used in the wild (at least, the projects I was/am
> involved with), I think it would make sense to retire it, especially taking
> into account the
Hi Colm
Yes, I think it makes sense. I don't think CXF DOSGi is heavily used.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:49 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
> little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years
Hi Colm,
I have never seen it used in the wild (at least, the projects I was/am
involved with), I think it would make sense to retire it, especially taking
into account the OSGi vague plans to support Jakarta. +1 from my side to
move it to the attic. Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
Hi all,
What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very
little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago -
https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). It's just a
maintenance burden unless someone steps up to maintain it properly.
Colm.
