Re: Server Response Policy

2008-08-22 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi I reckon it would be useful if it were possible to explicitly state in the CXF WS-Policy feature that a given policy expression is inbound/outbound only. Perhaps another option is to provide reusable policy interceptors which could simply (and blindly) assert some policies using preconfigure

Re: Server Response Policy

2008-08-08 Thread Fred Dushin
Well I can definitely work around the problem, just by configuring my interceptors to check off the same assertions on the outbound side. This requires though, that I stick a reference to some request state information on the exchange, and that I ensure that an OutInterceptor is installed

Re: Server Response Policy

2008-08-08 Thread Daniel Kulp
Hmm.. I'm not really sure, but this MAY be correct behavior. I'm thinking something like the MTOM policy. For that, there has to be something on the outgoing side to see if the MTOM policy is there and turn on MTOM if so. It's somewhat like some policies are "enforced" on the incoming chain

Re: Server Response Policy

2008-08-07 Thread Glen Mazza
context: http://www.nabble.com/Server-Response-Policy-tp18877899p18882270.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Server Response Policy

2008-08-07 Thread Fred Dushin
I'm having trouble with the CXF policy framework, which is causing a little bit of grief. I think this is a developer, as opposed to a user issue, as I /think/ it points to a bug in the policy framework. If not, I can migrate the conversation to the users list. What I'm finding is that