The VOTE to release Apache Daffodil 3.3.0-rc1 is now closed.
The vote passes with:
6 binding +1
The VOTE thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/yk32g06xk31ryd3k2rsnmc2lfvtj044c
The vote breakdown is:
+1 Mike Beckerle (binding)
+1 Joshua Adams (binding)
+1 Steve Lawrence (binding)
+1
I agree; I'll close the vote thread, release Apache Daffodil 3.3.0, and fix
our NOTICE as a bug fix immediately afterwards. Thanks for the link to the
licensing how-to, Steve. I see it also says we don't need to modify our
LICENSE or include each NOTICE in its entirety, only everything
This page mentions LICENSE and NOTICE files for binary distributions:
https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#binary
If they are distributed in the convenience binary, no matter how many
levels of transitive dependencies, the LICENSE/NOTICE information needs
to be included.
That said,
I downloaded the helper binaries for each new dependency (except xmlresolver on
which I'd already done due diligence as a direct dependency of Saxon-HE - the
rest of those dependencies are dependencies of xmlresolver itself so I'd missed
them) and checked LICENSE/NOTICE files. What is the rule
Hmm, I missed those new dependencies. Do we need to update our
LICENSE/NOTICE files in daffodil-cli?
Looks like we already have xmlresolver mentioned, but we have nothing
for the other dependencies?
On 3/21/22 12:00 PM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
+1
FYI,
+1
FYI, apache-daffodil-3.3.0-bin/lib has 6 new jars in it. Those new
jars are new transitive dependencies added by the bump of Saxon-HE
from 10.6 to 11.2. Their names are:
commons-codec.commons-codec-1.11.jar
commons-logging.commons-logging-1.2.jar
+1
I checked:
[OK] links in email are correct
[OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt, download and dnf)
[OK] verified download of binary
[OK] Successfully used apache-daffodil-3.3.0-bin.tgz
[OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct
[OK] RAT check passes
On 3/18/22 12:06,
+1
- Ran all sbt test suites on Java 8.
- Ran all sbt test suites on Java 17.
- Compiled nightly test suite schemas and executed test suite on Java 8.
- Compiled nightly test suite schemas and executed test suite on Java 17.
- Ran dfdl-schema sbt tests without issue.
- Successfully
+1 (binding)
I checked:
[OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE) (minor
exception with DAFFODIL-2612 and -2599)
+1
I have verified signatures of all packages and gave been using the
3.3.0-SNAPSHOT extensively.
Josh Adams
On Mar 18, 2022 12:07 PM, "Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)"
wrote:
Hi PMC members,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.3.0-rc1.
All distribution packages,
10 matches
Mail list logo
