Re: Workflow did not run? - was: Re: [apache/daffodil] 4th (and final) cut of New Layer API & Improved Implementation (PR #1187)

Nevermind. I learned that workflows don't run if your branch has conflicts with the branch it will merge into. On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 1:18 AM Mike Beckerle wrote: > The push to this branch on my fork usually causes our workflows that test > it on all those configurations, to run. > > Nothing ru

Workflow did not run? - was: Re: [apache/daffodil] 4th (and final) cut of New Layer API & Improved Implementation (PR #1187)

The push to this branch on my fork usually causes our workflows that test it on all those configurations, to run. Nothing running though. It says no workflows. Anybody have a clue why? On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 12:24 AM Mike Beckerle wrote: > *@mbeckerle* commented on this pull request. > > Late

DO NOT REVIEW QUITE YET (Getting Very Close tho) Re: [apache/daffodil] Third Cut at Simplfying Layers - uses reflection to simpify variable handling (PR #1176)

I am creating negative tests. There are already a couple bugs that are problematic. A processing error during the read operation of a layer stream does not propagate as a parse error and cause backtracking as it should. On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 6:50 PM Mike Beckerle wrote: > @mbeckerle

DO NOT REVIEW YET - Re: [apache/daffodil] Third Cut at Simplfying Layers - uses reflection to simpify variable handling (PR #1176)

This is waiting for more tests for the various error conditions so that there will be coverage of the error paths. On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:33 PM Mike Beckerle wrote: > @mbeckerle pushed 1 commit. > >- 1e4f2b8 > >

Re: Apache Daffodil VSCode Extension Issue Input

Thank you for this Mike. I do have some questions as to what the program, data and root should be set for this schema. I posted the question here https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode/issues/653 if you can take a look when you have a change. On 2024/01/02 20:17:28 Mike Beckerle wrote: > Ple

Re: Apache Daffodil VSCode Extension Issue Input

Please see PR: https://github.com/DFDLSchemas/envelope-payload/pull/1 On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 12:32 PM Mike Beckerle wrote: > I'm creating an envelope-payload example schema under DFDLSchemas on > github. > > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 1:49 PM Shane Dell wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am reaching ou

Re: Apache Daffodil VSCode Extension Issue Input

I'm creating an envelope-payload example schema under DFDLSchemas on github. On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 1:49 PM Shane Dell wrote: > Hello, > > I am reaching out to the dev community to ask for some help/input on an > issue that is in the Apache Daffodil VSCode Extension GitHub repository. > The sp

Re: Apache Daffodil VS Code Extension

Yay! On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 4:22 PM Shane Dell wrote: > All, > > I am excited to announce that the Apache Daffodil VS Code Extension is now > available via the VS Code Extension Marketplace. The quickest way to search > for it is to go to the marketplace and search for "asf" or "daffodil". > > T

Re: Apache Daffodil

Gautam, I've added you as a contributor. You should have access to assign bugs to yourself now. Thanks, - Steve On 10/15/19 4:22 PM, gautam gupta wrote: > Hi Dave, > Thanks for the prompt response. I have created my JIRA account > (gautamgupta). > > I will go through beginner issues and see whic

Re: Apache Daffodil

Hi Dave, Thanks for the prompt response. I have created my JIRA account (gautamgupta). I will go through beginner issues and see which one i can pick up. Best, Gautam On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:02 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > CC: Gautam since I’m not sure he is subscribed. > > Gautam - please subsc

Re: Apache Daffodil

CC: Gautam since I’m not sure he is subscribed. Gautam - please subscribe to dev@daffodil.apache.org Regards, Dave > On Oct 15, 2019, at 4:33 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: > > Hi Gautam! > > That sounds great! > > I would take a look at the Jira issues and see if any of those sound > interesting

Re: Apache Daffodil

Hi Gautam! That sounds great! I would take a look at the Jira issues and see if any of those sound interesting to you. We have also labeled a handful of issues as "beginner" that we think would be good for someone new to Daffodil, so picking up one of those might be a good starting point. https:

Re: Apache Daffodil on Twitter?

We do have a twitter account at https://twitter.com/ApacheDaffodil None of the Daffodil committers are particularly great at twitter/social media, so we're still getting used to it, but are working at it. - Steve On 3/26/19 5:45 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > while sending out a „happ

Re: apache-daffodil-2.2.0

Hi Weber, The Apache Daffodil 2.2.0 API introduced the InputSourceDataInputStream class as the preferred way to provide data to Daffodil. This constructor accepts either a byte array, a java.nio.ByteBuffer, or a java.io.InputStream. Hopefully your shared memory interface can be represented as one