Re: Questions about addressing warnings for daf-2926

2024-09-26 Thread Mike Beckerle
I'm ok adding this now, so long as there are comments in the code easily found indicating this is non-portable DFDL feature. E.g., put keyword "PORTABILITY" in the comments so that we can search it easily. The idea is in the future, should portability become a bigger deal than now, we can add some

Re: Questions about addressing warnings for daf-2926

2024-09-26 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
Will do! By extension, this means we'll be deprecating/removing the allowBigIntegerBits tunable and the DeprecatedBigIntegerBits WarnID, correct? -- Lola Kilo From: Mike Beckerle Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2024 7:54 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Questions about addressing warnings for daf-2926

2024-09-26 Thread Mike Beckerle
Hmmm. I had entirely forgotten we had such tunable and warnID. So we were letting people turn this on/off before because we allowed it, but since DFDL doesn't formally allow it we had deprecated the use of bits for bigInteger types, but let people continue to use it via the allow property. Removin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.9.0-rc2

2024-09-26 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
+1 (binding) I checked: [OK] links in email are correct [OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt, download and dnf) [OK] verified download of binary and source [OK] Successfully used apache-daffodil-3.7.0-bin.tgz [OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct -- Lola Kilo __