org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] split separator work into two phases - to isolate
non-backward-compatible behavior change
Agreed, 1024 is way to small for plenty of formats.
In fact, what are your thoughts on removing the restriction completely?
I guess the downside is that a too lax schema might ca
t;
>
> ----
> *From:* Steve Lawrence
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 8, 2018 11:49:46 AM
> *To:* dev@daffodil.apache.org; Mike Beckerle
> *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSS] split separator work into two phase
body arrays are BIG, that this
default of 1024 just seems silly to me.
Comments?
From: Steve Lawrence
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 11:49:46 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org; Mike Beckerle
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] split separator work into two phases - to isolate
I'm in favor of this.
Would it be possible to add a tunable to flip the behavior between
current/broken and new/fixed? That would make for a very clean path
towards deprecation. We can just warn users for a couple releases that
the tunable will be flipped at some point and give time for users to
Due to this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1975
This is a non-backward-compatible change. The impact of it could be significant
on existing schemas. Depending on scale of the impact we may have to put in
flags to turn on/off the changed behavior. Love to avoid that, but
