e Beckerle
From: Dave Fisher
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 12:48:15 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Cc: Mike Beckerle
Subject: Re: ICU version incompatible between IBM DFDL and Daffodil
Hi -
I have some “meta” questions to ask here. Not really technical but more about
the re
nt, though I'm not
> yet convinced.
>
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Steve Lawrence
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 7:45:51 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org; Mike Beckerle
> Subject: Re: ICU version incompatible between IBM DFDL and Daffodil
>
: Re: ICU version incompatible between IBM DFDL and Daffodil
I don't think it's worth backporting to ICU 51.1. There were a handful
of bugs that were fixed by that upgrade.
To me, this sounds like another good reason to switch the TDML runner to
work how I mentioned in a review comment:
https
I don't think it's worth backporting to ICU 51.1. There were a handful
of bugs that were fixed by that upgrade.
To me, this sounds like another good reason to switch the TDML runner to
work how I mentioned in a review comment:
Daffodil 2.2.0 uses ICU4J 62.1
IBM DFDL uses ICU4J 51.1
These are not compatible. Hence, annotating some of the tests in Daffodil, so
that they will try to also run the test under IBM DFDL if it is found on the
classpath doesn't work.
I tried backing out daffodil's dependency to 51.1,
