ials, so the
stored property
> is now identified by entity 'id', driver and provider.
>
> http://tracker.deltacloud.org/set/130
>
>
> -- Michal
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dies Koper
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
&
---
>> From: Michal Fojtik [mailto:mfoj...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 11:37 PM
>> To: dev@deltacloud.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: DataMapper support for CIMI attributes
>>
>> On 11/13/2012 01:10 PM, Koper, Dies wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
egards,
Dies Koper
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Fojtik [mailto:mfoj...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 11:37 PM
> To: dev@deltacloud.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DataMapper support for CIMI attributes
>
> On 11/13/2012 01:10 PM, Koper, Dies wrote:
>
On 11/13/2012 01:10 PM, Koper, Dies wrote:
Hi Michal,
The horrible looking 'uuid' field is SHA1 hash composed from
credentials, driver name and provider string, so different clients
will
not override their properties.
This is something I've been wondering about, should these properties be
s
Hi Michal,
> The horrible looking 'uuid' field is SHA1 hash composed from
> credentials, driver name and provider string, so different clients
will
> not override their properties.
This is something I've been wondering about, should these properties be
stored per user or per resource?
I mean, if
