Sounds ok. As far as I've understood the bval spec no reusable library must add any validation.xml because this file must only exists once for the whole app. There is no way of 'overloading' or preconfiguration for it as far as I'm aware. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From:
Good direction What about @UnitOfWorkScoped ? Cheers, Arne Am 06.06.13 18:34 schrieb Jason Porter unter lightguard...@gmail.com: WebWorkUnit ? On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: dialog is misleading (in the technical context). workflow is
What about AutomaticConversationScoped or similiar? AFAIR CODI starts the conversation automatically Hmm but ViewAccessScoped is also very similiar to a automatic conversation... don't know 2013/6/10 Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de Good direction What about @UnitOfWorkScoped ?
Sounds good, too! But i believe, that many user would believe, that the conversation automatically ends, too. Maybe we can find a name to inidicate that the conversation only automatically starts? 2013/6/10 Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de To honor the automatic nature
all committers do have rights and are HIGHLY welcome to update them! Even as non-committer you can log on via 'anonymous' and then you'll get a button to ship a diff to the committers list. LieGrue, strub From: John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com To:
Interesting, and if I don't have commit rights send an email to site-...@a.oor email@example.com? On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: all committers do have rights and are HIGHLY welcome to update them! Even as non-committer you can log on via 'anonymous' and