Re: [VOTE] logo-color

2014-06-14 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 for blue 2014-06-14 20:55 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: hi @ all, this second vote is about the color and therefore the final logo. i've uploaded the candidates provided by jim at [1]-[4]. please send a +1 for one of them. regards, gerhard [1]

Re: [data] dto and isNew

2014-06-16 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Why don't we use entityManager#contains instead of checking the ID? 2014-06-16 10:22 GMT+02:00 Karl Kildén karl.kil...@gmail.com: Hi, On could argue that the real problem is that the algorithm that decides if it should be a save or persist. It uses some portable way of deciding this that

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.0.0

2014-06-16 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2014-06-16 13:40 GMT+02:00 Rafael Benevides benevi...@redhat.com: +1 Em 14/06/14 12:00, Gerhard Petracek escreveu: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 8th release of Apache DeltaSpike out. The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]). The tag is available at [3]

[Data] Update/Delete via @Query?

2014-06-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, i currently try to execute a update via @Query - @Modifying @Query(UPDATE BasketItem SET status = ?1 WHERE e.basket.basketId = ?2) public abstract int updateStatus(int status, String basketId); Is it possible? Is it also possible with a DELETE statement? I get following

Re: [Data] Update/Delete via @Query?

2014-06-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Ah damn, sorry! Should be ofc: @Query(UPDATE BasketItem e SET e.status = ?1 WHERE e.basket.basketId = ?2) Will do further tests. 2014-06-17 16:49 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: Hi, i currently try to execute a update via @Query - @Modifying @Query

Re: [Data] Scope of repositories

2014-06-18 Thread Thomas Andraschko
, Thomas On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, AFAICS repositories are non-scoped, right? Isn't it possible to make them appscoped? Regards, Thomas

Re: [Data] Scope of repositories

2014-06-18 Thread Thomas Andraschko
or: @Repository(scope = ApplicationScoped.class) 2014-06-18 12:25 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: Hi Thomas, my problem is that when i inject it in a ViewScoped bean, it tries to serialize it but it isn't serializable. Could we make it configurable? Maybe we could

Re: [Data] Scope of repositories

2014-06-18 Thread Thomas Andraschko
13:12, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com wrote: or: @Repository(scope = ApplicationScoped.class) 2014-06-18 12:25 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com : Hi Thomas, my problem is that when i inject it in a ViewScoped bean, it tries

Re: [Data] Scope of repositories

2014-06-23 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Serialization works fine in my test project but i created an issue for the AppScoped problem! ;) 2014-06-19 0:27 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: I will provide an example on friday! 2014-06-18 19:30 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 Le

DS-419 Interceptors on partial beans - Closed?

2014-06-23 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, any reason why we closed this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-419 It's important if abstract repositories are used. Regards, Thomas

Re: [DISCUSS] supporting different spec versions

2014-07-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko
#1 2014-06-30 23:32 GMT+02:00 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com: I think #1 is really the only way we can realistically continue forward. We should communicate though that those matrices which use earlier versions of the spec(s) probably will not receive as much attention, probably just

Re: first steps for the next release

2014-07-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2014-07-05 15:41 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: hi @ all, if there are no objections, i will start with the first steps for the next release (v1.0.1) by the end of next week. regards, gerhard

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.0.1

2014-07-14 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2014-07-13 16:12 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: +1 regards, gerhard 2014-07-13 16:11 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 9th release of Apache DeltaSpike out. The artifacts are deployed to

Re: DeltaSpike Stickers

2014-08-26 Thread Thomas Andraschko
they look really great! Can somebody import some of them to germany? :D 2014-08-26 2:28 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com: Hi all, For JavaOne, I ordered 300 DeltaSpike stickers. They're 2 vinyl stickers, good for laptops, etc. You can see a picture here:

Re: first steps for the next release

2014-09-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2014-09-17 5:59 GMT+02:00 Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de: +1 2014-09-17 1:23 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com: +1 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Gerhard Petracek

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.0.3

2014-09-21 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 (off topic: would it be possible to add the release notes in the votes like it's done in myfaces?) 2014-09-21 20:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: +1 regards, gerhard 2014-09-21 20:07 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org: Hi, I was running

Re: v1.1.0 instead of v1.0.4

2014-10-31 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 because of some new features like window quota handler 2014-10-31 10:21 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @romain: we don't start a 2nd line - the transition is quite simple and most users won't see a changed behavior at all. it's just about increasing the visibility

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 - all apps are working fine 2014-12-01 12:13 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: +1 LieGrue, strub On Sunday, 30 November 2014, 18:25, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 13th release of Apache DeltaSpike

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.2.1

2014-12-21 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 it would be great if you could add a link to the resolved jira issues in the future 2014-12-21 21:18 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau

Re: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
have/need it at owb) regards, gerhard 2015-03-15 21:11 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com : +0 for an extra module before i implemented the asm proxy for the partial bean module, i tried it many hours to understand and implement it with commons

Re: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
javassist is about 600kb and the user needs to manage it 2015-03-15 21:48 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: do you mean the jar size? the difference is just ~130kb when we shade asm or not 2015-03-15 21:40 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: But owb

Re: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
/fcf4d77d Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/tree/fcf4d77d Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/diff/fcf4d77d Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: fcf4d77d692971a6a93731e64d044f6cf1757d6c Parents: d3a21c0 Author: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.3.0

2015-03-04 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 Am Mittwoch, 4. März 2015 schrieb Christian Kaltepoth : +1 Am 04.03.2015 18:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com javascript:;: +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github

Re: v1.4.0 instead of v1.3.1

2015-05-02 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-05-02 20:16 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org: it looks like the mail never arrived - once again: -- Forwarded message -- From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com Date: 2015-05-01 18:51 GMT+02:00 hi @ all, if there are no objections, i'll

Re: first steps for the next release

2015-05-08 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 Am Freitag, 8. Mai 2015 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : +1 Le 8 mai 2015 13:13, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org javascript:; a écrit : hi @ all, if there are no objections, i will start with the first steps for the next release (v1.4.0) by the end of next week. regards,

Re: [COMMUNITY] DeltaSpike += Ron Smeral

2015-04-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Welcome Ron! :) 2015-04-17 15:10 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org: The DeltaSpike PMC is proud to announce a new addition to our community. Please welcome Ron Smeral as the newest DeltaSpike committer! @Ron: Please add yourself to the developers section (in

Re: Broken Arquillian tests don't fail

2015-06-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-06-15 20:12 GMT+02:00 Harald Wellmann hwellmann...@gmail.com: At the moment, quite a few Arquillian tests are broken but don't fail the build. Above all, this affects the Weld profile where the weld-core dependency seems to be missing. In the OWB profile, there are some broken tests

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.4.1

2015-06-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-06-14 10:25 GMT+02:00 Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de: +1 2015-06-13 12:19 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com: +1 On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Le 13 juin 2015 10:56, Harald Wellmann

Re: Bean Validation Modules vs Java EE version

2015-08-21 Thread Thomas Andraschko
IMO the module should work on both EE6 and EE7. We often provide a WAR file and the customers decide where to deploy it. 2015-08-21 19:00 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @ee6 only: that's correct however, it looks like that user is using a manual setup with bv v1.1. -

Re: [DISCUSS] Add persist and merge methods to EntityRepository

2015-08-23 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Thats not required. You can just extend/implement EntityManagerDelegate 2015-08-23 17:37 GMT+02:00 Harald Wellmann hwellmann...@gmail.com: +1 Regards, Harald Am 22.08.2015 um 03:23 schrieb John D. Ament: All, Based on the findings from Harald, and the general issues being seen with

Re: first steps for the next release

2015-07-28 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-07-28 19:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber

Re: v1.5.0 instead of v1.4.3

2015-08-03 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-08-03 22:23 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org: hi @ all, if there are no objections, i'll change the version number to 1.5.0 before the next release. reasons: - security fix - changes for window-handling regards, gerhard

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.4.2

2015-07-20 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 - my apps are working fine 2015-07-19 21:57 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org: There are some changes from newer team members where I can't find a relationship between code change and JIRA ticket. I've pinged on one ticket, I'd like to see that answered before giving a vote.

Re: Header injection due to unescaped key in JsfUtils

2015-07-21 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, please create a issue. 2015-07-21 9:13 GMT+02:00 Ortwin Escher ortwin.esc...@iav.de: Hello, As wished to the developers list: The JsfUtils used in DeltaSpike URLEncode the values but not the keys. This allows header injection (see

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.1

2015-10-26 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-10-25 2:17 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > +1 > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Jason Porter > wrote: > > > Let's try this again +1 > > > > On Saturday, October 24, 2015, Jason Porter > > wrote: > > > > > +- > > > >

Re: first steps for the next release

2015-10-14 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-10-14 9:38 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

[Proposal] CdiManagedRunnable

2015-09-10 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, it's often required to manual activate scopes in a async threads/runnables if you don't use JavaEE 7. I already used this in 3-4 projects in the last 3 years. My current API looks like: CdiManagedRunnable - A abstract class with implements Runnable and starts the RequestScoped via

Re: [Proposal] CdiManagedRunnable

2015-09-19 Thread Thomas Andraschko
gt; Ursprüngliche Nachricht > Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > Datum: 18.09.2015 16:28 (GMT+01:00) > An: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Cc: Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> > Betreff: Re: [Proposal] CdiManagedRunnable >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.2

2015-12-08 Thread Thomas Andraschko
We had small talk about performance here: http://apache-deltaspike-incubator-discussions.2316169.n4.nabble.com/multithreaded-repository-issues-td4660132.html Till now, it seems that nobody did a real benchmark between DS and plain JPA. But please open new discussion about it - this is not related

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.2

2015-12-07 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-12-07 9:06 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 > Le 7 déc. 2015 08:20, "Christian Kaltepoth" a > écrit : > > > +1 > > > > 2015-12-06 21:01 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > > > > > +1 > > > On Dec 6, 2015 14:54, "Gerhard

Re: Entity graphs

2015-12-29 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 for splitting it up The integration of EntityGraph like Spring Data looks also good - not sure if we can do something "better" 2015-12-29 13:18 GMT+01:00 Harald Wellmann : > There is a JIRA issue [1] asking for entity graph and stored procedure > support in the data

Re: first steps for the next release

2015-11-26 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2015-11-26 11:31 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek : > hi @ all, > > if there are no objections, i will start with the first steps for the next > release (v1.5.2) by the end of next week. > > regards, > gerhard >

Re: Test Only module requiring Java 8

2016-06-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
IMO If we have a java-ee7 testing module, it's also ok to add a java-8 testing module. So +1. 2016-06-05 6:46 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > I pushed up a branch to review the commit on. > > >

Re: [COMMUNITY] DeltaSpike += Matej Novotny

2016-06-03 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Welcome! :) 2016-06-03 10:37 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Welcome Matej! > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

Re: Next release -> 1.7?

2016-06-02 Thread Thomas Andraschko
gerhard > > > > 2016-06-02 1:09 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > Hey guys, not a lot of input here, but unless I hear a -1 I'll make the > pom > > files 1.7 sometime on Friday. > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM Tho

Re: Next release -> 1.7?

2016-06-02 Thread Thomas Andraschko
ure that the other changes require more than a patch release. > (e.g. for users the client window handling wasn't changed significantly.) > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-06-02 10:10 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > >: > > &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.7.0

2016-06-20 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Thanks for the release John! Not sure but did you sent the announcement mail with the same topic as the vote mail? google mail merged it in the vote mails. 2016-06-20 16:45 GMT+02:00 sebb : > On 20 June 2016 at 15:40, John D. Ament wrote: > > Sebb, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.3

2016-02-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2016-02-05 14:01 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek : > Hi, > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 22th release of Apache DeltaSpike > out. > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]). > > The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4]. > They will get

Re: no more JVM proxy

2016-02-12 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Because we decided to shade asm, so it was no problem to use also for interfaces. So we only have one implementation which handels interceptor handling etc. 2016-02-12 14:15 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Not exactly. If unclear read my question as: why do we *require*

Hotfix release 1.5.4

2016-02-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, i already talked to gerhard and i need a hotfix release with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1078 it will also contain https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1074 if anyone would like to fix a issue for this release, please let me know. Regards, Thomas

Hotfix release 1.5.4

2016-02-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, i already talked to gerhard and i need a hotfix release with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1078 it will also contain https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1074 if anyone would like to fix a issue for this release, please let me know. Regards, Thomas

Re: Hotfix release 1.5.4

2016-02-17 Thread Thomas Andraschko
> > > > On Wednesday, February 17, 2016, Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gpetra...@apache.org');>> wrote: > > > >> short addition: > >> i would start with the release in ~24h. > >> > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.4

2016-02-18 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2016-02-18 21:30 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek : > Hi, > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 23rd release of Apache DeltaSpike > out. > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]). > > The tag is available at [3] and the release-branch at [4]. > They will get

Re: Cutting over to Java 7

2016-04-12 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 gerhard i don't see any big benefit to switch to any newer Java / JavaEE / CDI until JavaEE8 / CDI 2.0. 2016-04-12 17:44 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek : > @antoine: > we support cdi 1.1/1.2 and ee7 already (see [1]). > > imo: > we just need to continue with ds2 once cdi2 is

Re: 1.6 to be the last release to support Java 1.6?

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Andraschko
basically +1 Most of our customers are using 1.7 since this year. I just wonder whats the benefit for us? I think there are no language features which would improve our code base. 2016-03-25 3:25 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > Hey guys, > > I've brought this topic up before

Re: Java EE 6 support

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Andraschko
-1 for dropping Java EE 6, we still have Java EE 6 users. Also, as gerhard said, we don't gain much benefit from dropping it. What about moving forward to DS 2.0 with Java EE 8 and Java SE 8 after the release of Java EE 8? 2016-03-25 15:44 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : >

Re: Donating Microscoped code

2016-03-26 Thread Thomas Andraschko
MethodScoped looks cool! Is there a real world usecase for DomainScoped and HeaderScoped? 2016-03-26 16:50 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha : > Cool! +1 > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:19 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > I have a backport of microscoped for

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.6.0

2016-04-03 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2016-04-03 0:54 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > +1 looks good to me. > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:46 PM Gerhard Petracek > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 24th release of Apache > DeltaSpike > > out. > > The

Re: problem in WindowIdHtmlRenderer

2016-04-04 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, we don't take a "complete unchecked" value at all. If you check AbstractClientWindowStrategy#getWindowId() - we cut down the windowId to max. 10 chars. Regards, Thomas 2016-04-05 6:07 GMT+02:00 Thomas Frühbeck : > Hi, > I couldn't find out, how to notify you correctly.. >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.6.1

2016-04-26 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2016-04-25 18:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Monday, 25 April 2016, 17:20, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau |

Re: Next release -> 1.7?

2016-05-24 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > Ok makes sense then > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

Re: DeltaSpikeProxyFactory questions

2016-05-09 Thread Thomas Andraschko
a) yup b) if it's unused, why not ;) Should be just an old case, it was refactored many times during developed because of some AppServers / versions. c) yup, feel free to align it :) 2016-05-09 13:30 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:24 AM Mark Struberg

Re: DeltaSpikeProxyFactory questions

2016-05-09 Thread Thomas Andraschko
ctory needs the > BeanManager as parameter? > Maybe we could introduce a new API which just exposes a native java > subclass proxy to retain backward compat? > In any case we miss a lot of JavaDocs! > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > > > On Mond

Re: DeltaSpikeProxyFactory questions

2016-05-09 Thread Thomas Andraschko
>> > >> Another way would be to create specialised proxy classes (like OWB) for > >> each InvocationHandler. BUT that would need distinct - but > reproducible - > >> proxy class names. > >> > >> In OWB we store the proxy class somewhere where y

Re: deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-1179 Don't use a static reference to a contextual bean, in the case of beans being reloaded by multiple deployments.

2016-07-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi John, thanks for fixing it. The current solution will be very slow and we should make DelegateManualInvocationHandler and InterceptManualInvocationHandler ApplicationScoped. It would be still great if you could compare the performance e.g. for 10.000 calls with our old code (with static) vs

Re: deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-1179 Don't use a static reference to a contextual bean, in the case of beans being reloaded by multiple deployments.

2016-07-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Oh sorry, you already made it ApplicationScoped with your second commit :) 2016-07-06 10:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > Hi John, > > thanks for fixing it. > The current solution will be very slow and we should make > DelegateMa

Re: [DISCUSS] GitHub PR Builder

2016-07-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 Stupid question but how can i merge PRs from github? The last PRs from georgekankava are looking good. 2016-07-06 8:54 GMT+02:00 Christian Kaltepoth : > I think such build jobs

Re: [DISCUSS] Tests for Payara?

2016-07-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 :) 2016-07-06 11:55 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek : > i asked them already (last year), however, they have(/had) an issue with > their arquillian-adapter. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-07-06 11:42 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > > > Hey guys > > > >

Re: deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-1179 Don't use a static reference to a contextual bean, in the case of beans being reloaded by multiple deployments.

2016-07-06 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Great! :) 2016-07-06 11:48 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > Yeah, tests weren't working :-) > > But good news, the Weld2 profile is working now. I suppose that this issue > was weld specific. > > John > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:40 AM Thomas

Re: [DISCUSS] Start a branch for DS 2.0?

2016-09-25 Thread Thomas Andraschko
not sure if a cdi2-module is enough we should also get rid of some of our api's which are in CDI 2.0 now 2016-09-25 17:28 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > 2016-09-25 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > > > Hey guys, > > > > Since its inception,

Re: Config rework, take 2

2016-11-10 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hey, one question: Currently the proxy handling just supports interfaces and doesn't use our proxy module. Doesn't it make sense to switch to our proxy module (which also supports abstract classes, interceptors)? 2016-11-09 12:55 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Pushed

Re: Config rework, take 2

2016-11-10 Thread Thomas Andraschko
I see but we could easily do it if we move it into an own module, right? 2016-11-10 17:36 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > 2016-11-10 17:31 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > >: > > > Hey, > > > > one question

Re: DS and CDI 2.0?

2016-12-20 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Some months ago we talked about CDI 2.0 and that we would likely create a new branch for java8 and CDI 2.0 only -> DS 2.0. There we could also clenaup our API and remove stuff which is now available in CDI directly. However, it would be great if it would be possible that DS 1.x could work on both

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.0

2017-05-27 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2017-05-27 9:06 GMT+02:00 Christian Kaltepoth : > +1, thanks Mark! > > 2017-05-26 17:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > Here is my own +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 26.05.2017 um 01:16 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >

Re: [VOTE] [CANCEL] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.0

2017-06-03 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi Mark, is everything ok with the current builds? I did a fresh checkout today i cant build anymore: The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1] The project org.apache.deltaspike.modules:deltaspike-data-module-test-java8:1.8.0-SNAPSHOT

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

2017-06-03 Thread Thomas Andraschko
basically +1 we can do some cleanup (like removing features + modules which are available in JavaEE8) BUT - many user won't use JavaEE8 until next year as the AS' are not ready. So IMO it's not necessary now. I will currently start to do some internal cleanup on the Data Module e.g. 2017-06-03

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

2017-06-03 Thread Thomas Andraschko
aking api-changes). > (+ only use cdi2,... as a new baseline once it's really useful.) > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2017-06-03 16:35 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > >: > > > basically +1 > > we can do some cleanup (like re

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

2017-06-04 Thread Thomas Andraschko
bout the comment around "micro-profile" as well as "cdi2 > as a new baseline once its really useful" > > John > > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 2:58 PM Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > IMO we should try to do a cut i

Re: [DISCUSS] updating prerequisite to Java 1.7 for DeltaSpike-1.8.x and higher?

2017-05-08 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+0 There is no big benefit for using java7. IMO we should just upgrade to java8 if we start DS 2.0. 2017-05-08 17:44 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Java9 is just around the corner and we still support Java6. > Do we finally like to raise our prerequisites to Java7 at

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Loader] > > not found. If this is unexpected, enable DEBUG logging to see the full > > error. > > 10:31:46,126 INFO [org.jboss.weld.Bootstrap] (Weld Thread Pool -- 6) > > WELD-000119: Not generating any bean definitions from > > org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.impl.AsmDeltaSpike

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-18 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Reverted my commit for now, will check it again in 2.0. Tests are looking now good again with TomEE. 2017-12-01 19:32 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > @john > iIRC ASM should be shaded, not sure why it happends > > Am Freitag, 1. Dezember 2017 sch

Re: [DISCUSS] releasing 1.8.1?

2017-12-19 Thread Thomas Andraschko
A user asked on the mailing list about a possible release date. Anything left we have to fix? 2017-11-29 16:30 GMT+01:00 Matej Novotny : > Give it a while please, as you noticed I am going through it now and > finding troubles running it with some of the latest fixes on

Re: CI for DeltaSpike?

2017-12-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko
@matej You also reopened a issue that i created. I'm currently in brasil, so i dont have time to look at it. I removed this call as its actually not required and the wrapping in PrimeFaces works fine. Not sure why it breaks navigation but we can simple revert it for this release. Am Freitag, 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.2

2018-05-16 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 2018-05-16 6:48 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > +1 > > Le mer. 16 mai 2018 00:11, Daniel Cunha a écrit : > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018, 18:36 Gerhard Petracek > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > regards, > > >

Re: provide a default Scheduler which is not using quartz as default?

2018-01-05 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+0.5 Of course it would be great to get rid of the quartz dependency per default but not sure... It's still effort and we have to maintain it... 2018-01-05 17:44 GMT+01:00 Arne Limburg : > Hi Mark, > > Shouldn¹t we just disable the update check in our quartz

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: DeltaSpike Deploy » Apache DeltaSpike Proxy-Module #2173

2018-01-11 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hmm no idea. Proxy modules rat:check runs fine on localhost. However, it fails in the datamodule for files in the target dir, which should actually be excluded (deltaspike/modules/data/test-java8/target/) 2018-01-11 15:23 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > Anyone looking at the

Re: Wrong license on proxy-module impl-asm

2018-01-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
We shaded it for compatibility reasons as many libs use ASM. 2018-01-15 9:06 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > +1 can you plz file a ticket? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 13.01.2018 um 15:35 schrieb John D. Ament : > > > > The license for

Re: bringing interdyn and invomon to DeltaSpike?

2018-02-09 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Also suggested dynamic interceptors some years ago - so +1. Just not sure if properties is the best way. Maybe we should think about if we should someday introduce something like a deltaspike xml config. Not sure. 2018-02-09 11:34 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek : > basically +1

Re: Welcome Alex Falb as new Apache DeltaSpike

2018-08-07 Thread Thomas Andraschko
welcome! 2018-08-07 8:56 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Welcome! > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn

Re: [DISCUSS] require Java8 and move to Deltaspike-1.9.x version?

2018-03-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko
IMO DS1.x = JavaEE 7 DS2.x = JavaEE 8 Java8 in 1.x is fine for me, we can try to improve our APIs with Java8 In 2.x we can even improve further and cleanup then 2018-03-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > 2018-03-01 15:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament

Re: atomic access to config values

2018-04-05 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 for ConfigSnapshot and Config#snapshot 2018-04-05 21:32 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Had a long discussion with Tomas Langer about atomic access this afternoon. > > What we came up with is probably better than 'ConfigTransaction', because > the 'Transaction' term

Re: InterceptorStrategy?

2018-04-24 Thread Thomas Andraschko
basically +1 but its still used currently 2018-04-23 11:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Hi guys, > > Do we still need InterceptorStrategy? > > If not, can we deprecate it and remove it from our built-in interceptors? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: [DISCUSS] ds for cdi 1.2+ only

2018-04-03 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 for 3) the workarounds are really not that big... i would leave it as it is for now and start with DS 2.0 (= CDI2.0 only) the next months. 2018-04-03 22:06 GMT+02:00 Gerhard Petracek : > hi @ all, > > since we will need to maintain v1.8.x for a while and it's too early

Re: Merge PRs

2018-11-12 Thread Thomas Andraschko
> > Am 12.11.2018 um 09:37 schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi, > > > > i would like to merge 2 PRs and close 1 PRs but it seems that i don't > have > > write access. > > However, i have write access to MF

Merge PRs

2018-11-12 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, i would like to merge 2 PRs and close 1 PRs but it seems that i don't have write access. However, i have write access to MF + OWB. So i wonder what additional steps i need to do, to get write access? Best regards, Thomas

Re: Merge PRs

2018-11-26 Thread Thomas Andraschko
nnibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 12 nov. 2018 à 10:53, Thomas An

Re: [VOTE] Move our git repo to Apache gitbox

2019-01-07 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 Am Mo., 7. Jan. 2019 um 18:09 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github < >

Re: Order by nested property in criteria

2019-04-24 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi, do you mean our Criteria(Support) API or the JPA criteria? Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 11:52 Uhr schrieb Arthur Gregório < arthursha...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > I was trying to find a answer for a really simple question about put an > order in queries when the property is nested (an entity

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-415) Nested @Folder throws IllegalStateException

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko (JIRA)
Thomas Andraschko created DELTASPIKE-415: Summary: Nested @Folder throws IllegalStateException Key: DELTASPIKE-415 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-415 Project: DeltaSpike

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-416) @Folder's name check/resolution is broken

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Andraschko (JIRA)
Thomas Andraschko created DELTASPIKE-416: Summary: @Folder's name check/resolution is broken Key: DELTASPIKE-416 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-416 Project: DeltaSpike

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >